Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gumcreme
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
gumcreme
8y ago
I know what an async worker and what sidekiq is. But apparently you don't know that in modern stacks you don't need this anymore and it was an oddity because of RoR. I am on mobile and don't have time to write down why, pleas
2.
▲
by
gumcreme
8y ago
> In a standard setup What is a standard setup in 2019, there is none? There is also no standard in using nginx as front facing entity. In my prior comment I was friendly and gave an example why some might not have nginx in their stack a
3.
▲
by
gumcreme
8y ago
ngninx supporting http/2 != Rails supporting http/2 Depending on the use case you leave out nginx sometimes, eg. when doing microservices. Not that nginx is bad but with other stacks you very often don't need nginx and/o
4.
▲
by
gumcreme
8y ago
> when creating web applications, starting from scratch or from a minimal base is massively slower Because every web app is the same CRUD app, right? Things evolved the last years, I build you any app as fast and create more maintainable
5.
▲
by
gumcreme
8y ago
While reading this thread, it feels like a flashback from 2009 and now, I remember what was my biggest gripe with Rails (next to all the bad parts mentioned here in this thread): It is the culture. I really find the Rails culture odd or tbh
6.
▲
by
gumcreme
8y ago
> a asynchronous worker manager something you don't need anymore with a modern stack > an upload manager, and BI tool standard stuff every other ecosystem has > mature gem ecosystem missing essentials like stable http/2 a
7.
▲
by
gumcreme
8y ago
> Rails scales Your post is a bit misleading. Rails can scale but to get there is different than with other stacks. Some would say, it's much more challenging or complicated, some would call it just a PITA and if you really, really
8.
▲
by
gumcreme
8y ago
Well framed and this is what we all learned and moved to: There are new paradigms out that just make so much more sense and which are followed by the majority. When I read the original submission, I mean just the title, I was facepalming in
9.
▲
by
gumcreme
8y ago
To be honest, your post is like this submission. It's not helping people who want to decide. You just say Vue is great but people would like to understand why or why it might be better than React. This submission is also not helpful be
10.
▲
by
gumcreme
8y ago
There were many times in the beginning of working with React when I checked out Vue because I was stuck. I was reading threads like this one where people were worshipping Vue and why it might be the better choice than React. People brought