gudenuf4gvmt

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by gudenuf4gvmt 9y ago

   I did not say they were not the best, I said they need to demonstrate basic journalistic integrity at any point. They fail to do basic story updates to reflect obvious errors. At that point, it’s not news AT ALL, it’s just entertainment. So
2. 2.▲
   by gudenuf4gvmt 9y ago

   Journalism is earned, not assumed. No matter the stance of RT vice still needs to demonstrate journalistic integrity. Have they? No. They’re on equal footing as i’m concerned. Propaganda is at least interpetable. Also they do tell blatant f
3. 3.▲
   by gudenuf4gvmt 9y ago

   I don’t see any reason you should view vice as better than RT—they’ve consistently shown a complete lack of regard for journalism, and they’re incentivized by page views rather (or in addition to) their owner. Why should they bother to get
4. 4.▲
   by gudenuf4gvmt 9y ago

   Another argument for open source search ranking. Anything else is likely biased and harmful.