gspr

11 ms·

241.
by gspr 7mo ago
This is such an incredibly imbecilic comment. Listen to this guy: "because you don't take the ultimate risk for what you believe in, you are dumb for suggesting you should do anything whatsoever". Go away. The world doesn&#x2
242.
by gspr 7mo ago
> Telling random citizens "run for office" is facetious, whether you mean it or not. Hard disagree. At least where I live, "random citizens" run for local office and succeed all the time. Also, complaining that you &q
243.
by gspr 7mo ago
It also makes no sense! "Fuck this, it doesn't matter - but I'll happily spend effort communicating that to others, because apparently making others not care about something I don't care about is something I do care abou
244.
by gspr 7mo ago
To feel something. To resist something bad. To stand for what is right. Do those sentiments mean nothing to you?
245.
by gspr 7mo ago
I realize that that's the situation. I'm asking why we're accepting it. Especially on flimsy grounds like "we don't own the software".
246.
by gspr 7mo ago
> The underlying tension is that "you own the car" means something very different from "you own the software running the car." How is this different from the 2000s, or the 90s, or even before, when the normal thing to
247.
by gspr 7mo ago
But you said people on busses and trains doing this get shut down. My experience is they don't.
248.
by gspr 7mo ago
I've definitely experienced this on public transit in cities in several different countries here in Europe. It's not an everyday experience, but it definitely happens.
249.
by gspr 7mo ago
I think "physical" refers to the fact that you initialize the state by pressing physical buttons. That's quite accurate.
250.
by gspr 7mo ago
> I have seen more benefit from it than harm. Same. I, too, am sick of bloated code. But I use the quote as a reminder to myself: "look, the fact that you could spend the rest of the workday making this function run in linear inst
251.
by gspr 7mo ago
Because Thiel is plainly, and in his own words, a regressive threat to democracy.
252.
by gspr 7mo ago
I absolutely believe you on the facts, and it all sounds very disgusting, but here's what I don't understand: customers and staff alike no longer like the clinic. Won't that be a huge boon to competitors, essentially ruining
253.
by gspr 7mo ago
This is an interesting take that I hadn't considered. Your analogy with a library break-in is good. I'll need to digest this. Thanks.
254.
by gspr 7mo ago
This is a good argument for not making it the default, but it would be nice to have it as a command line switch.
255.
by gspr 7mo ago
Of course not. But if the passage they can recite is long enough that it is copyrightable, then surely distributing a thing that (contortedly or not) can do said recitation is a form of redistribution of the work itself?
256.
by gspr 7mo ago
Interesting! Is there anywhere a discussion around their refusal to include your fix?
257.
by gspr 7mo ago
It surely doesn't matter how leading or contorted the prompt has to be if it shows that the model is encoding the copyrighted work verbatimly or nearly so.
258.
by gspr 7mo ago
> I feel as though, from an information-theoretic standpoint, it can't be possible that an LLM (which is almost certainly <1 TB big) can contain any substantial verbatim portion of its training corpus, which includes audio, image
259.
by gspr 7mo ago
> Training on copyleft licensed code is not a license violation. Any more than a person reading it is. Some might hold that we've granted persons certain exemptions, on account of them being persons. We do not have to grant machines
260.
by gspr 7mo ago
> Why do you assume I assume it's doable? :P Because you say we need to figure out techniques to do it. If it's not possible, then there are no techniques to do it. Since you want the techniques, I assume you assume that they e
261.
by gspr 7mo ago
> We'll need to figure out the techniques and strategies that let us merge AI code sight unseen. Why do you assume that's doable? I'm not saying it's not, but it seems strange to just take for granted that it is.
262.
by gspr 7mo ago
Your attempts at derailing the discourse is not only frustrating – in the case of climate change it might just kill us all. You're a danger.
263.
by gspr 7mo ago
The dark future possibility here is that the big guy is allowed to launder the intellectual property of the little guy, but not vice versa.
264.
by gspr 7mo ago
> If “AI-rewriting” is accepted as a valid way to change licenses, it represents the end of Copyleft. Any developer could take a GPL-licensed project, feed it into an LLM with the prompt “Rewrite this in a different style,” and release i
265.
by gspr 8mo ago
> It is fairly ok for meetings … when it works. And if you never have to change camera or microphone settings. > and calendar integration. The little notification that pops up telling you your meeting is about to start based on your c
266.
by gspr 8mo ago
I actually don't think it's corruption. I think it's incompetence. But that might be even harder to overcome.
267.
by gspr 8mo ago
> You can literally just use the online form. Have you actually tried using your search engine to query applying, and seeing just how easy it is to optionally apply online? This whole story is about how they're trying to pressure yo
268.
by gspr 8mo ago
Providing it for convenience is fine. Having to accept the terms of conditions of Google or Apple as the only way is insane.
269.
by gspr 8mo ago
I've flown with many European budget carriers and have never once seen this requirement. Sure, they might charge for or not provide printed boarding passes, but they've always sent me a PDF or PNG boarding pass by e-mail or provid
270.
by gspr 8mo ago
This is an insane take. Apple and Google both reserve the right to deny accounts to people without any legal appeal at worst. At best, a legal dispute would have to be resolved in US courts. How other countries (including my own) accept tha

More ›