gruez

38 ms·

781.
by gruez 5mo ago
>Come on. I'm not here to Google things for you. And what, I'm here to do research for your arguments?
782.
by gruez 5mo ago
It's ineffective in the sense that in the worst case, bots can buy used iPads or whatever and use a robot arm + camera to do the scraping, but each incremental step increases the cost for scrapers. TLS fingerprinting means you can&#x27
783.
by gruez 5mo ago
>However, CF is unnecessarily making people on 5G connections from desktops do turnstiles as it looks like a scraper using a mobile proxy. This will become more and more of an issue as more laptops have 5G modems in them. What makes you
784.
by gruez 5mo ago
>They will limit your local crawler from accessing pages. They will demand you use their crawler. Source? According to cloudflare, their crawling service don't get any special treatment from their WAF/CDN.
785.
by gruez 5mo ago
>It can be used to force users to use certain software, e.g., certain browsers, and to enable Javascript subjecting users to data collection, surveillance and ads >Certainly the problem is not the individual www user who doesnt use an
786.
by gruez 5mo ago
Elaborate. Are you getting turnstile challenges? Or blocked entirely? Are you using a weird browser configuration or non-mainstream browser? Do you have extensions that lie about your software/hardware configuration?
787.
by gruez 5mo ago
That's not what a 0day exploit is. It doesn't allow you to take over arbitrary GPS receivers, for instance.
788.
by gruez 5mo ago
>Imagine a world where every car company would get money every time someone uses their car. So oil companies? Moreover car companies do get more money with more car use. More driving means more parts required, more servicing needed (from
789.
by gruez 5mo ago
How's the video quality/latency on all of these? RDP or parsec are probably the gold standard, but I doubt cheap arm SOCs can implement either properly.
790.
by gruez 5mo ago
That's a fair complaint, but banning data centers in NY isn't going to make RAM or GPU prices cheaper.
791.
by gruez 5mo ago
docket: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70448987/in-re-meta-and...
792.
by gruez 5mo ago
>Do you want to click through and spend money on the ads? Nobody "wants" ads, but they do want the free content they get today, which are funded by ads.
793.
by gruez 5mo ago
More importantly it's privacy preserving because it doesn't allow for bidirectional communication, which third party cookies could do.
794.
by gruez 5mo ago
I'm not sure what this blog is complaining about. >Problem one: Over-rating search, social, and app store ads Isn't this a problem with today's ad attribution system? The author doesn't try to argue how the new system
795.
by gruez 5mo ago
So basically the whole ESG craze from a few years ago?
796.
by gruez 5mo ago
How many funds track NASDAQ vs S&P 500? Feels like the former is way more niche/sector specific than the latter.
797.
by gruez 5mo ago
>and cut the seasoning window from 90 days to 5. 90 days or 5 days, it doesn't really matter because the float will be tiny due to the 6 month lockup. What kind of price discovery are we expecting that would happen in the other 85 d
798.
by gruez 5mo ago
If you have evidence of corruption, present it. Otherwise it's just generic cynicism leading to a thought terminating cliche.
799.
by gruez 5mo ago
similar discussion on the same study: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326721
800.
by gruez 5mo ago
>each package is signed by the person who packages it. That means that if you are pulling from a random place, you can be reasonably sure its the same package because the keys verify. Who's downloading packages from untrusted source
801.
by gruez 5mo ago
Is it really that much worse than using a package manager that drops a binary that you're not going to inspect anyways?
802.
by gruez 5mo ago
This but unironically. There's no way to ensure that nobody overwrote your .profile or .bashrc with a backdoored sudo that steals your password, or runs your command and then runs an evil command afterwards.
803.
by gruez 5mo ago
>I wonder if the website owners realise at all how many actual users they lose by this sort of "protection." How many people do you think are browsing with a weird enough config (eg. custom browser like OP, or some weird config
804.
by gruez 5mo ago
>Official Firefox can be leaky unless you build it yourself with some build-time changes or use a fork with such[0]. Am I guessing right that you still have Webcompat, RemoteSettings, and Nimbus enabled still? How do you know a compatibi
805.
by gruez 5mo ago
It didn't fail for him in firefox, even with privacy settings enabled.
806.
by gruez 5mo ago
He's using a custom browser, apparently: https://hacktivis.me/projects/badwolf
807.
by gruez 5mo ago
Depends on what type of scraping you're trying to stop. For the dumb scrapers that would try to scrape every page on a git forge (for which there are a bazillion pages for a modest project, because of how the site works), yeah it might
808.
by gruez 5mo ago
Bad optics aside, it doesn't actually reflect reality. See my other comment. You can enable basically all the privacy settings and still pass turnstile. Tor browser in a VM passes it, of all things. https://litter.catbox.moe
809.
by gruez 5mo ago
>So why is Cloudflare saying the author got blocked because of WebGL? No idea. I can't even reproduce the error OP got with webgl disabled. https://litter.catbox.moe/y42l22k97tgv96nx.png
810.
by gruez 5mo ago
This blog post is filled with false assumptions. >Turns out it's because Cloudflare wants to have a fingerprint of your device via WebGL, the only reason for doing this would be tracking. > So Cloudflare just banned all WebKitGTK

More ›