growse

27 ms·

391.
by growse 3y ago
You can. There's a plethora of e2e messaging apps out there all catering to different threat models.
392.
by growse 3y ago
No. part of the whole value prop is that you take it out of its box and plug it in, then it works.
393.
by growse 3y ago
Ah, the sound of people not using their type system properly. Parse, don't validate.
394.
by growse 3y ago
> > at that point what are you testing? > Memory. In unit testing, the "memory" is not the system under test though.
395.
by growse 3y ago
I'm a little ignorant of the upcoming regs, but are they aiming to basically say "if a customer wants to leave a service, then the provider must provide them with all their data for free"? I've not thought about the unin
396.
by growse 3y ago
It is quite expensive to be a full member of RIPE though. Most people with smaller requirements can go through a sponsoring LIR to get PI space (like a /48).
397.
by growse 3y ago
It's Google's prefix (`2001:4860:4860`) with `8888` and `8844` on the end. If you can't remember that, the problem's not the protocol.
398.
by growse 3y ago
"just add an extra router". I think when conceiving of potential issues with this, or thinking about the possible problems of trying to merge two overlapping networks together, your imagination is coming up a little short. It&#x27
399.
by growse 3y ago
> Make them all inter-compatible and backward-compatible by modifying the packet structure to accept a variable length address. "Simply draw the rest of the Owl".
400.
by growse 3y ago
Everyone's internal ipv4 setup "works" right up to the point you need to join to another internal network and have overlapping subnets. Or until you want you network segment to grow beyond a few thousand hosts. Or until.... I
401.
by growse 3y ago
Linux doesn't have a big "enable IPv6" switch, so it's not clear what you mean. The only way I can think of getting the behaviour you describe is if you configure the network to hand out v6 addresses and routes to hosts,
402.
by growse 3y ago
This has nothing to do with ignorance of the law, it's about intent. You can be fully versed in insider trading law, receive some information that you reasonably assume isn't protected, trade on it, and that's not insider tra
403.
by growse 3y ago
If that were true, non-voting shares would be worthless. The value also includes a future claim on the company's assets and cash flows.
404.
by growse 3y ago
Interestingly, the kubernetes approach is the opposite one. Dependencies between pods / software components are encouraged to be a little softer, so that the scheduler is simpler. Starting up, noticing that the environment doesn't
405.
by growse 3y ago
One approach might be to review manually, then label the pr and trigger the pr based off the label being added. Challenge there is that if the pr changes, it's a bit clunky to retrigger the CI (you have to remove, then re-add). I guess
406.
by growse 3y ago
Nope. You want to live in a society, then you abide by that society's collectively decided rules. You're not the only one impacted by your decisions.
407.
by growse 3y ago
> There is nothing wrong with peaceful protests, but blocking traffic and people glueing themselves to roads and trains are not passive acts. The police have been escorting just stop oil protesters for their own safety, as the public sta
408.
by growse 3y ago
Out of interest, what's the value of having a distinct master and staging branches, rather than just tagging prod releases on staging?
409.
by growse 3y ago
> They should not punish you for exercising your GPL rights by refusing to do business with you. Maybe, but the GPL explicitly permits this by only requiring source to be distributed to those who receive the software. If, instead, the
410.
by growse 3y ago
> If the bridge has loose stones, you put up a sign that says the bridge is hazardous and has loose stones and provide a map with an alternate route. This is quaint, but not actually the problem. The problem is that every bridge manufact
411.
by growse 3y ago
> Which is a highly context-specific evaluation, so is it better decided by the person with the most knowledge of their own circumstances, or across the board with no context at all? It depends on the context. In many, many contexts, peo
412.
by growse 3y ago
> By this logic the FDA would have to ban Tylenol and Robitussin. Tens of thousands of ER visits every year. It's almost like there's a balance of harms to be evaluated. I'd bet the cheap availability of paracetamol etc. s
413.
by growse 3y ago
The government's got to pay for the road the ambulance drives you on when you stop breathing.
414.
by growse 3y ago
> I'm not 100% sure I understand what you mean by "owning your feature backlog." If you're stewarding the project, you have the sole authority over over which features land when. You can prioritise and drag (or even r
415.
by growse 3y ago
> But if you "prove the market" you basically allow company-B to do what you do, literally exactly what you do, but without the development overhead. If someone can out-compete you by simply cranking the infrastructure handle o
416.
by growse 3y ago
IBM pulled in $60b last year. For many tech companies (and especially their investors), selling out and realising a return is the very definition of success.
417.
by growse 3y ago
This doesn't work reliably for future timestamps. If a user submits a local timestamp and you then convert it to UTC, you're using the current definition of what we think that offset will be at that future time. However, timezon
418.
by growse 3y ago
> Just set an alarm clock like everyone else This person does not have, or does not know anybody with a sleep disorder.
419.
by growse 3y ago
Um, no they don't?
420.
by growse 3y ago
The problem is that the hold is effectively indefinite in the controller's mind, and therefore not an option. But that's not what they said on the radio.

More ›