4 ms·
If that were true, non-voting shares would be worthless. The value also includes a future claim on the company's assets and cash flows.
by growse 3y ago
If that were true, non-voting shares would be worthless.
The value also includes a future claim on the company's assets and cash flows.
- cm2187 3y agoAlso that's kind of a dodgy silicon valley corporate structure, you don't typically find that in blue chip companies.
- dragonwriter 3y agoPreferred stock, usually with reduced or no voting rights, is very much older than Silicon Valley.
- drpossum 3y agoYes, it was qualified with "let's say non-voting shares don't exist" for a reason.