Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
groundzeros2015
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
31.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
6 million dollars in conferences sounds like a lot? Are they holding the conference?
32.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
The C macro systems never last. Just write it! It’s no harder than a for loop.
33.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
ES 2.0
34.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
Yes it was an analogy about measuring two unrelated things.
35.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
This is just dumb. You wanted to improve performance but measured memory instead? Whoops. Why not measure performance for which there are many good metrics.
36.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
If you aren’t willing to change the system (have no business reason to) then you can’t implement or benefit from any new paradigms or advice and are necessarily bound by prior decisions.
37.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
The fallacy is assuming it takes more work to get good performance. When what’s really lacking is clarity about the problem and solution. Optimizing code for max performance does take work. But just not doing incredibly dumb things and writ
38.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
That quote mostly applies to human organizations where the connection between outcome and metric is questionable. Or where incentives unexpectedly change behavior. If your goal is fast software it can be measured quantively and you’re likel
39.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
Cases where your cpu work is not a step in that pipeline are rare. (Cannot be parallelized)
40.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
Bottleneck is a misleading word here. Yes the network is slow. But you can still save 200ms in response time by working on your CPU.
41.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
No they don’t. Because the small sellers don’t make much money.
42.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
Engineers and scientists would like to imagine our society operates off a specification. But laws are only justifications for what people in power want to do. All of what you’re talking about reinforces the myth that the text matters and is
43.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
It sounds like you’re saying “sophisticated marketing”. Can you distinguish that from marketing that say McDonald’s does towards kids?
44.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
> who is pretending this? The comment I’m replying to: > still feels like they got away easy for raping children's minds
45.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
The comment above says that Facebook “raped” children’s minds. When really it failed to protect children from the dangers of the internet. The dishonesty of not acknowledging the existing problems with the internet, suggests we are trying t
46.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
That’s not what the comment I’m replying to says.
47.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
Doesn’t Facebook invest a significant part to protect their brand by limiting and censoring content? Last I checked Facebook didn’t have Rotten content on it.
48.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
Are we going to pretend that internet did not expose inappropriate content to children prior to Facebook?
49.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
Containers and VMs are well supported.
50.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
1mo ago
Oh you will be imagining some time soon.
51.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
2mo ago
That’s great. They still don’t have 1950s ethics around organizational membership. To give one example. The Boy Scouts is a relatively tame org. It has different offices, voting, treasury, awards, oaths, meeting notes. All of that is basica
52.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
2mo ago
Because of the level of commitment, loyalty, and group sacrifice expected. The article isn’t about subject matter. Virtual communities require no group sacrifice. You join the lobby and you leave. Maybe there are some niche WOW guilds out t
53.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
2mo ago
That’s not what I’m referring to. Good writing is not limited to professional writers, and focus on the medium can often be a distraction from good ideas.
54.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
2mo ago
> None of those compare to cult shunning I absolutely disagree. I’ve seen cult shunning and if there is a version which has mass appeal now it’s politics.
55.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
2mo ago
I think you’re correct that mainstream leaders of the parties try not to talk about each other in that way and mostly succeed. But I absolutely do know family members and friends treat it with that level of zeal.
56.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
2mo ago
I have no sympathy for group bullying, hazing, or manipulation, but the concept of a cult seems to only be possible post-enlightenment. We say there is a secular society outside that we always need to preserve and that sets limits on the le
57.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
2mo ago
If that’s the definition both political parties are included.
58.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
2mo ago
> people who want to be writers but rarely read books. And I don't get it. Some of the best books are not from writers, but people who have something to say and writing happens to be a medium.
59.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
2mo ago
Trump grievance is allowed and the comments are extremely low quality.
60.
▲
by
groundzeros2015
2mo ago
Yes, friction like this. It’s just not a fully featured SQL implementation. As their saying goes, it competes with fopen not oracle.
More ›