grive

10 ms·

31.
by grive 6y ago
Just because property can be used to artificially create scarcity, due to laws that were piled on by centuries of history and common use, does not change the nature of property. You are not contradicting his idea of property, what you say o
32.
by grive 6y ago
I've only worked on one project ( https://www.dpdk.org/ ) using meson+ninja. Overall it seems to be an improvement, barring the make idiosyncrasies that needs to be forgotten. That being said, if the project had used m
33.
by grive 6y ago
It's weird to conflate C as a language and its ABI, as the glue between other languages. The glue in question is the ABI, period. Rust does not interface with C, it interfaces with a C library (dynamic or static) that is in a standardi
34.
by grive 6y ago
Yes, pretty much. I find an interesting paper, note its DOI, go to sci-hub to download it. Never tried to search on sci-hub itself.
35.
by grive 6y ago
In the systems I have seen: * Because the rules are generated. Building a subpart sometimes means invoking a generated rule. * Because make is used for other things: building binaries, libraries, examples, test suite, documentation -
36.
by grive 6y ago
When you install bash-completion on your system, usually a function is defined to autocomplete make rules for you. It works with all projects, as it does not rely on the rules being specially marked. ( https://github.com/scop
37.
by grive 7y ago
> Most western countries have proper regulation regarding waste disposal. > wont be solved while big economies decide to export their waste Western countries do not have proper regulations if one of the possible outcome for waste is t
38.
by grive 7y ago
This is a good story, but the title seems needlessly clickbait. The flaw was fixed rather quickly, the process for communicating the issue did not seem to be a hassle. It does not really say that the app is "super not secure". Jus
39.
by grive 7y ago
I'm guessing you found the passive-agressive one here: > Losing control of our data was unacceptable, as was paying for a tool that was not part of our core offering for the CERN community; therefore, we will end the trial of this p
40.
by grive 7y ago
The business disappears, people turn to a competitor or create new ones if the need is still there. Business are allowed to fail, that's healthy for the overall system.
41.
by grive 7y ago
The RGPD wall of Techcrunch is a real put-off (Choice partners that cannot be deactivated, IAB partners that must be unsubscribed from the third party website (which of course does not work), seriously?). No reason to accept this cancer,
42.
by grive 7y ago
e.g. -- fossil. This is exactly the issue with it: its author(s) lament that git has not all of these things integrated, but they are ignoring that this is exactly why fossil cannot gain a wider adoption. It has opinions about how the team
43.
by grive 7y ago
GDPR-wall to access (part of Oath network). Oath is really a cancer regarding GDPR. It is definitely non-compliant and makes it as worst an experience as possible to control your data. I hope they will get the harshest fines for this.
44.
by grive 7y ago
> when they lost $38 billion the union workers didn't get bills in the mail instead of checks. They reduced their paychecks and benefits, so they actually shared part of the losses. Which entitle them now for a share of the profits.
45.
by grive 7y ago
This is asinine, there is no "other hand" here. At +8C, most of humanity is dead. You can be "12 times richer", it won't save you or anyone else. > and increased wealth can be used to build seawalls, sequester ca
46.
by grive 7y ago
This is not journalism. This is a hit-piece on EasyList, with a clickbait and false title. It seems even plausible, reading it, that the author knows about uBlock origin but avoids naming it, instead listing the two sellouts that are morall
47.
by grive 7y ago
Then find "eco-friendly" investments that are not green-washing. It takes research. I'm thinking supporting tree-planting NGOs might be a good start for example. This goes directly towards carbon-sequestration.
48.
by grive 7y ago
They mostly think that incinerators need to be modernized first, and old ones should be forbidden to use. This is costly, and the whole "desupply" chain is not transparent: people do not know whether their local incinerators is re
49.
by grive 7y ago
This is just so far out. "AI" is currently expert systems and we are seeing its limitations (see setbacks in autonomous driving). It has nowhere near the potential to drive the search and extraction of energy sources in landfills.
50.
by grive 7y ago
That's just magical thinking. Nothing suggests that it is in the realm of possibility. What is the energy potential in the materials in a landfill? How much is wasted by scouring them and trying to properly extract it? Compared to prev
51.
by grive 7y ago
I consider the main issue to be the first point: that they are purely consumption-oriented platforms. This might evolve for the better though with a little imagination(°). However I disagree with the second point. Smartphones were optimized
52.
by grive 7y ago
Transforming a problem into pattern recognition seems like a good way to use your brain natural inclinations. Very neat little article.
53.
by grive 7y ago
Does unlisting means removing the entry? Unlisting to me seems like they only stop advertizing that they know your profile.
54.
by grive 7y ago
Unlisting does not mean that the info is removed. If they have full access on anyone having installed the app, it means they also have mined the conversations with your contacts. So they might not advertise what they know anymore, but the p
55.
by grive 7y ago
Producing value has no externalities? That's new! > As for landfills being cheap, that isn't a bad thing. That means the externalities at those sites are low. No, that means that most of the actual price is not accounted for an
56.
by grive 8y ago
Okay > People move to the city because of things to do which includes nightclubs, restaurants, museums, theater, sports venues, cultural events, etc. Now remove nightclubs from this list, and you still get a list of attractive reasons to
57.
by grive 8y ago
Given their field, it is safe to assume this is a joke.
58.
by grive 8y ago
False dichotomy. You can close all the city's nightclubs and you wouldn't have a city with only housing. Only a very small subset of people living in the city will use nightclubs. It is reasonable that they are not given priority
59.
by grive 8y ago
Your high-level description resemble a cover letter used on some open-source project to introduce a patch series, justifying the changes. You could achieve the same by using an empty commit, or tracking those in the bug tracker. DCVSs are a
60.
by grive 8y ago
Citing Black Panther as an example of a departure from > Well-known artistic depictions of the future [...] showing a marked lack of diversity. Black Panther was a purely american product, Comic book superhero is the most stale and rehas

More ›