gress

62 ms·

601.
by gress 12y ago
Which was a user-friendly decision during the period where android phones frequently died after only 4 hours of use.
602.
by gress 12y ago
You were already on android.
603.
by gress 12y ago
If true, you should be seriously scared of what Apple is capable of.
604.
by gress 12y ago
Have you stopped working at Google?
605.
by gress 12y ago
Yes, the docs say exactly this.
606.
by gress 12y ago
Google wallet was unpopular and was impeded by the cell carriers. It was a business failure, not a technical one.
607.
by gress 12y ago
It may be a natural function, but it can be amplified and distorted by institutions and media. Not all cultures are the same, and there are reasons for that.
608.
by gress 12y ago
Not everyone is equally antisocial.
609.
by gress 12y ago
Golang is a terrible name.
610.
by gress 12y ago
Pauliz
611.
by gress 12y ago
The group wasn't large, and there is no evidence they were compromised at the same time.
612.
by gress 12y ago
No. It was a labor intensive social engineering attack that couldn't be perpetrated on a wide scale, not a technical breach. However it's still a weakness and Apple can take steps to improve things.
613.
by gress 12y ago
Are you seriously claiming that Google is no longer on the front lines of defending free speech because people like me damn them either way ?
614.
by gress 12y ago
On security, yes. On "free speech, etc.", no.
615.
by gress 12y ago
Fair enough. At least you acknowledge that Google no longer stands for these things.
616.
by gress 12y ago
Chemex
617.
by gress 12y ago
... who was happy to work for Google.
618.
by gress 12y ago
In your view, what important issues do these people who are shaping the future of mankind know and care about?
619.
by gress 12y ago
Thanks - that is part of what I'm saying. Also, as another point, 'profit maximization' is predicting the future, and there is a lot of room for different views of what the future will be.
620.
by gress 12y ago
Not really - a corporation is a group of people. Sometimes those in control of it have no goal other than profit maximization, but by no means always.
621.
by gress 12y ago
Are you saying they rejected your app because this screen transmitting feature captured the Apple Menu icon?!
622.
by gress 12y ago
What was the violated trademark?
623.
by gress 12y ago
The pro-Android Apple-haters aren't likely to suddenly have a change of heart whatever happens.
624.
by gress 12y ago
What was the stated reason for rejection?
625.
by gress 12y ago
Presumably you are going simply by blogosphere opinions and never actually worked with app review yourself.
626.
by gress 12y ago
Why on earth were the dies and machining destroyed? That just seems like a wrong decision.
627.
by gress 12y ago
You do realize you're begging the question by simply asserting that economics is the discipline that makes the world a better place and that critiques from outside are shallow?
628.
by gress 12y ago
How on earth can you make that point?
629.
by gress 12y ago
Who would have enough money to sponsor research?
630.
by gress 12y ago
Choosing an economics major means not choosing any of the other subjects. Since modern economics is focussed on greed and selfishness, it seems perfectly reasonable that not spending time on other parts of the human experience would lea

More ›