greenthrow

49 ms·

661.
by greenthrow 4y ago
It still is. Just because it includes physical signifiers that can be measured doesn't mean it isn't still a social construct. To give a contrived example; if I say people with ring fingers over 3 inches long are Longfings and peo
662.
by greenthrow 4y ago
Uhhh if you have a 1,000 line function it definitely should be broken down. Even a 100 line function is borderline. It's gonna be nigh impossible to write comprehensive unit tests for a 1,000 line function.
663.
by greenthrow 4y ago
Oh look a Reason article where "government is bad." What a shock. Baby formula needs to be closely regulated (see: history around baby formula.) Poor people need to be able to care for their babies (see: babies dying is bad.) Seem
664.
by greenthrow 4y ago
Can we stop it with this absurd fear mongering already? There's millions of EVs on the road now. I have had my Leaf for 8 years and keep seeing this same tired FUD online. The incidents of fires from electric cars are extremely low. Th
665.
by greenthrow 4y ago
Politely end the interview immediately. Really. I had an in person interview with multiple people at a company and the CTO came in for his part and immediately started telling me how he wasn't supposed to be there he was supposed to be
666.
by greenthrow 4y ago
Take a look through what is deleted, it's mostly junk. In my experience Wikipedia could stand to be more aggressive with its pruning. Low quality articles waste your time because you have to read them for a bit before you realize it is
667.
by greenthrow 4y ago
It's super regressive. You should be able to maintain all the content and all formatting and styling using far less data than a PNG or JPG of that same text requires. Images of text are super wasteful and their ubiquity is a condemnati
668.
by greenthrow 5y ago
As a musician; no. That is not sufficient. Any audible watermark -- and as the grandparent comment correctly points out, that is any that is going to do its job -- is unacceptable. It is modifying what the artist intended you to hear in a
669.
by greenthrow 5y ago
> Solar, Batteries and Wind and such are just not there yet. And may not ever be. What is your definition of "there"? Because green energy is already cheaper than nuclear. There is zero need for nuclear. Wind, solar, hydro and