greendream17

6 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by greendream17 4y ago

   How does what I say validate all or any criticism of science, I just don't think that people who work in this industry get to take all progress though human history and put that on their own lapel. Do you know this podcast decoding th
2. 2.▲
   by greendream17 4y ago

   No, but there are algebraic structures that allow for this, like the Riemann sphere. The proper way to talk about this is the concept of "zero dividers". For Z the only zero divider is zero, 0/0=0. The closest thing to what
3. 3.▲
   by greendream17 4y ago

   I would give historians a little bit more credit than that. Sure if you have some agenda and something too proof then you just have to go back X years to find something like a justification. The other day I was reading the transcript of the
4. 4.▲
   by greendream17 4y ago

   Nothing about this is surprising once you understand that your brain is not trying to be happy or sad, but only trying to minimise prediction error.
5. 5.▲
   by greendream17 4y ago

   If PostgreSQL is to SQL what the browser is to HTML then what is X to SPARQL. One of the reasons why I don't think X "exists" is because it's not a good way of working with graph. I sometimes think there should be some
6. 6.▲
   by greendream17 5y ago

   Recent Podcast by with Wolfram, maybe the quote is apocryphal or it was by another mathematician, anyway the point was that there is this "toxic" culture of always focusing on formal correct systems while not appreciating the crea