Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
greatscott404
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
A striking union would be fined, they can figure out the allocation amongst themselves.
2.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
As in workers can't legally demand higher wages as a group, as in those negotiations won't be legally binding and fines would be imposed on strikers, no need to hit anyone.
3.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
"literally"?
4.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
We have that it's called "supply and demand".
5.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
When corporations band together to extract higher profits we penalize them, same logic should apply to labor unions.
6.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
I'm opposed to throwing the proverbial baby with the bathwater.
7.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
Wow. I myself hail for your fabled "west", and I'm not suggesting that free association should be scrapped nor that violence be committed against its practitioners.
8.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
Why? Corporations are largely great assets to a country, labor unions on the other hand are parasitic cartels.
9.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
Am I committing thought crimes?
10.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
Are you suggesting that employee cartels squeezing money from consumers is justified? Want worker protections ask for that, no need to burden businesses any further.
11.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
The only reason labor unions are legal is that certain unions have outsized political clout, in a perfect world labor unions would be illegal under antitrust laws as forcing companies to pay workers more than what a free market dictates ine
12.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
They follow the law, if they are targeted by special taxes then it's a violation worthy of retaliation.
13.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
Foreign nations are increasingly using US tech firms as piggy banks, they fine and levy arbitrary taxes from them, or just use the threat of such to demand some change in behavior, it's quite the racket.
14.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
GDPR is trade restriction as the notion of "digital privacy" is perpetrated by those who want to restrain US tech companies.
15.
▲
Setting the record straight on AWS and open source
(aws.amazon.com)
7 points
by
greatscott404
7y ago
|
0 comments
16.
▲
by
greatscott404
7y ago
I'd like to hear if anyone has a better solution than ContentID considering the scale, laws, and stakeholders involved. Everybody likes shitting on it but it's the best solution to the problem.