gravypod

97 ms·

931.
by gravypod 7y ago
I wish jetbrains would tackle the CitC space. They're well poised to do so.
932.
by gravypod 7y ago
I took this more to mean the author liked NNs because they were not transparent. To model something with an NN you don't need to know all of the mathematical constructs that go into the NN.
933.
by gravypod 7y ago
I've only experienced issues when using bazel with third party package management systems. If you can own all of your source it, and it's descendants, are easily my favorite build systems. It's features complement modern soft
934.
by gravypod 7y ago
That's a feature of Kube Secrets. They can be mounted on the fs just like ConfigMaps.
935.
by gravypod 7y ago
I don't know much about Vault aside from it being used for secrets management. What is the use case, outside of already using Hashicorp stuff, of Vault where it makes sense to use? Also, is there a benefit of using a sidecar here over
936.
by gravypod 7y ago
I love jetbrains products but I hate their product segmentation. I wish I could use one IDE (smoothly) for all of their supported languages. It's one of the best editor experiences I've ever had though.
937.
by gravypod 7y ago
Is there any way to download warcs collected by the internet archive? I'd like to try and back some up and use them for some search algorithm benchmarks.
938.
by gravypod 7y ago
Does Jsn provide extra features over Jsonnet or Cuelang?
939.
by gravypod 7y ago
Would it be possible to avoid standardizing, and coupling, to a single ID type? It should be possible to locally store IDs as strings so the consumer of the IDs doesn't need to know how to parse it and the provider of the ID (the servi
940.
by gravypod 7y ago
Looking at this I think it would be really cool for someone to build a Wheel of Misfortune to help dry run some of these scenarios for debugging.
941.
by gravypod 7y ago
I wish something like this had IPMI. Would make for an easy and portable demo cluster to learn on.
942.
by gravypod 7y ago
For me it's amazing how much more performant software can be when you can just serialize and load data from disk using something like recordio or leveldb.
943.
by gravypod 7y ago
That's unfortunate. This went from killer product to meh. EKS currently has some issues with EBS that make it a pain that Fargate VMs would make go away
944.
by gravypod 7y ago
Does this integrate with persistent volumes to allow you to mount EBS into these? If so this is a great offering since it directly integrates with VPC, EBS, ELBs, and everything with no node overhead to worry about.
945.
by gravypod 7y ago
SDS works by allocating a chunk of memory that can fit a header + your string data. The APIs all consume pointers and internally it mutates it's copy of the pointer so it can get at the metadata. So it can be used to generate strings t
946.
by gravypod 7y ago
It would be cool to integrate the deep speech engine with home assistant. That's one of the big benifits of leon in my opinion.
947.
by gravypod 7y ago
Rabb.it was really cool because it was a shared web browser that was ephemeral and neutral. Both people could control it, there was very low latency, and you could keep doing sensitive stuff while rabbit was also open. I haven't been a
948.
by gravypod 7y ago
Has anyone set something like this up with sound + multiple viewers? I've been looking for someone to help me watch TV with friends who are remote. I used to use rabb.it but I think that died.
949.
by gravypod 7y ago
That looks like a great resource! Thank you!
950.
by gravypod 7y ago
> It's not really like programming. The tools are deeply integrated into the physics of the system. What specifically makes electronics different from modeling other systems with software? DSP immediately comes to mind as somethin
951.
by gravypod 7y ago
Is there a high level overview, for programmers, of how chip design software works? Something I eventually want to investigate is building some of those pieces of software but I have no idea where to get started learning about that ecosyste
952.
by gravypod 7y ago
Which of these things is a benefit of make?
953.
by gravypod 7y ago
"Varying degrees of effort" and "the default" are very different. Do you have an example of those features that can be demoed in redo?
954.
by gravypod 7y ago
Blaze-like systems offer other benifits over makefiles that are, in their own right, amazing. 1. Distributing modules with BUILD files makes everything just work 2. You don't think at the level of commands/files, you think at the
955.
by gravypod 7y ago
Yes, it is not included. It is a publicly available part that you plugged in. There are a limited number of people who actually have a use case where they want to manage their own kube cluster. Most people would be happy if they tried a man
956.
by gravypod 7y ago
This would be a great time for someone to implement a version of this that's paid and has other SaaS features (print-to-mailed-letter, etc). I bet if you streamlined it you could get some customers pretty easily.
957.
by gravypod 7y ago
> For me to automatically recommend K8s to my clients I'd need to see a (near) zero friction deployment options that's fully feature compliant and truely fully managed. It's at that point I would be happy to say, "Sur
958.
by gravypod 7y ago
You can build controllers and CRDs to completely integrate any platform features you need all while maintaining a workflow with kubecfg and using kube to manage state recovery, roll out, and networking.
959.
by gravypod 7y ago
Kube is one layer that you use to get to a completely platform independent version of this. Look at kubecfg for an example of this being applied. When Cuelang, the next step after jsonnet, is finished and integrated with kubecfg it will be
960.
by gravypod 7y ago
I've been working on a tool to help with these sorts of cross-service boundary tests. Something that can help validate configuration, code, and runtimes are valid while providing all the traditional things you'd expect from unit t

More ›