gravisultra

9 ms·

31.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
A first party source, means directly from the originating party. In this case, there is no statement from Iranian officials that exists. Just 2nd hand quotes. Other first party sources would be photographic evidence, videos... like what we
32.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
Yep, not a single first party source. You have not provided the Iranian statement that these well known Zionist media properties claim exists.
33.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
None of that has anything to do with "Israel", which is a creation of Zionism, again from the late 1800s.
34.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
> Iranian authorities acknowledge more than 3000 deaths in the unrest, This is a claim without evidence. Please post the Iranian statement where they say there were 3000 deaths. > The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency (HR
35.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
No it dates to the late 1800s with the creation of Zionism. It's important that we stay rooted in history and not religious mythology.
36.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
Which Iran did not do. There's a single report from an anti-Iran agency saying that Iran claimed 3,000 killed protesters (not 20k-30k). Iran never said that though, and I would challenge anyone to produce evidence that they did.
37.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
Zionists have been meddling in the Middle East since their ideology was created in the late 1800s.
38.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
That's pure Israeli propaganda, and as you see there is absolutely no "up rising" from Iranian citizens. They are however, uniformly against Israel and the US given that we started this illegal war by bombing a girls school a
39.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
[flagged]
40.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
Look at the blowback on Vercel after the CEO went to Israel. You may be putting your money there, but consumers aren't having it.
41.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
I don't know what a GCC is but I assure you that no one is opening offices in Israel.
42.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
The Iranian people absolutely do not support Israel. I'd show you dozens of videos of thousands of people in the street calling for Israel's destruction, but you said you don't want any more proof that counters your narrative
43.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
Israel only exists because of US taxpayers like me supporting it. That support no longer exists. Most of the US military facilities built in the Middle East to defend Israel have been destroyed and will not be rebuilt. The reason Israel att
44.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
You're hardly an unbiased reporter then. It's in your best interest to minimize the exposure to your country's defeat.
45.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
This is all from today, there's much more but it's not on me to do your homework for you. This isn't even going into how every day Israel is more hated by the entire world. The Zionist project has been defeated. * https:&#x2
46.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
There's too much to post but I put a few links in the sibling comment.
47.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
Israel has taken extreme damage over the past couple of days. Iran hit Tel Aviv with cluster bombs last night. Many buildings destroyed. The Israeli censorship and propaganda can no longer contain the reality of the situation. Tel Aviv got
48.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
This thread is in response to your claim: > Europeans never actually colonized anything but America.
49.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
Palestine was colonized by European Ashkenazis. > the difference with colonizing being when the Dutch arrived, there was nobody there This is a really racist thing to say. Vietnam was colonized by the French.
50.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
None of this is backed by reality. In fact, Tel Aviv and all of Northern Israel have been taking extreme damage the past 48 hours.
51.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
Palestine, South Africa, Vietnam...
52.
Palantir's Double Conflict of Interest in the War Against Iran(bylinetimes.com)
11 points by gravisultra 7mo ago|0 comments
53.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
This is the logic that cost Kamala Harris the election. Liberals are absolutely addicted to putting their head in the sand about how much people care about genocide and Israel's influence on our lives. We've hit the breaking point
54.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
> "Stop the war in Iran" is a majority position in polls. People don't vote on that, because people don't care about the war in Iran. This is simply incorrect and pure wishful thinking on your part. > You are ju
55.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
I'm talking about the majority position, not minority.
56.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
If Iran had nuclear weapons we would not be bombing them now and the world would be a more peaceful place. I certainly trust Iran with nuclear weapons a lot more than I trust Israel with them. We need Iran to keep Israel in check.
57.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
How my tax dollars are spent is a domestic issue. As is not implicating me in war crimes. > They're not, you're just in a small minority The majority do not support this war, nor do they support Israel. Our politicians refu
58.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
Budgets using my money interest me. Do you have a source for that $500B claim?
59.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
History does not say otherwise. The US however has a history of attacking Iran, including murdering 190 people on a civilian flight: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran_Air_Flight_655
60.
by gravisultra 7mo ago
This is a valid criticism. Whenever there is a push to improve life for US citizens, we are told that we do not have the funds. Yet, here we see an essentially unlimited budget to fight Israel's war of aggression against Iran, with zer

More ›