Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
graphene
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
121.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
Rather than resort to more sophistication in terms of voting and/or flagging systems, I am inclined to think the best hack would be a social one: Make the link to the guidelines more prominent. Why not place it in the bar at the top of ever
122.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
But there wouldn't be a relationship, since the flags would be anonymous, and I presume filling in a comment would not be necessary for flagging. Given those two prerequisites, I think it's a great idea.
123.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
The only way you will see FP doing massive parallelism at speeds even close to current best is if they wrap the C MPI interface, and I have yet to see any functional message-passing APIs which aren't tarted-up imperative environments True
124.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
It's interesting that in Norvig's talk you linked, while praising python, he also mentions that he is a supporter of the functional programming style for scientific work, both because it more transparently mirrors the mathematical formulati
125.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
The link between education of workers and their wages is indeed probably less direct and/or strong than he makes it out to be. However, the increases in productivity you mention have to come from smart people thinking hard about how to do t
126.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
You are right about ice, but metals (which are comprised of neutral atoms which lack an intrinsic dipole moment like that of H2O, and nearly always have crystalline structure) are not held together by Van der Waals or similar forces - one n
127.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
My apologies if I've annoyed you, that really wasn't my intention. I've enjoyed this exchange, and would be unhappy to have it end on this note. My questions were genuinely meant to structure the conversation and probe your thinking, not to
128.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
Something that might have something to do with this is the difference between the DRAM in RAM and the SRAM on the CPU die. On DRAM, the bit is stored as a charge on a capacitor, which is (apparently) susceptible to cosmic ray bit-flipping.
129.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
Well, I don't know... If you postulate beforehand that the ground won't deform, that means it will match any force applied to it, including that of a plummeting experimentalist. On jupiter, the force of gravity is greater, so the force appl
130.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
You say electromagnetic interactions dissapear at any significant distance, yet they are responsible for holding materials together? Therefore the rigidity of things around us cannot be caused by the Pauli exclusion principle. Not true. T
131.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
But if one atom "tries" to pass through another, the electrons from both atoms will be spatially very close to each other, and consequently, they will be occupying very similar states. Coulombic repulsion certainly also plays a role, but it
132.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
If that were true, why doesn't all matter stick together in one giant gob? If the structure of an atom is "obviously" affected by the exclusion principle, why would the structure of materials, made up of atoms, make any difference? In fact,
133.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
Because that's just the way they are :-) More precisely, no two electrons can ever occupy exactly the same quantum mechanical state. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion
134.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
this doesn't really comapre the two forces qualitatively I think.. Suppose you did the same experiment on Jupiter; you would fall a lot faster but the speed of decelleration wouldn't be affected. Perhaps on something like a neutron star the
135.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
fascinating story.. kind of a blemish that the article contains an error: a virus which can't get into cells is just a scrap of amino acids waiting to be destroyed. To the best of my knowledge, viruses do have DNA, if very little. That is
136.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
technically, I don't think that's quite true; a company can book profits even as it's paying off a loan which is bigger than the profits or even than total turnover as long as (operational cash flow) - (interest payments) > 0. I think i
137.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
Follow up: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009702921_j...
138.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
that's not the case, the physics in fact is very different for a single atom than for a lump of metal. A single atom has very specific set of electron energies as a consequence of the electrons being confined to the area around the nucleus.
139.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
about the brightness at the ends - I'm pretty sure that is due to the fact that this is a pi-conjugated system; that is, the pi-bonded electrons can jump around the whole molecule. This, together with the fact that the molecule is finite in
140.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
An aspect of this I feel hasn't been addressed is that in this case, the product of the commercial activity is information (in the form of a map), which has a reproduction cost tending to zero. This will of course make it difficult to sell
141.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
Eurozone != EU When you sum the GDPs of Euro using countries, you get 12.23 trillion dollars, or slightly less than the USA's GDP ( http://www03.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=eurozone+gdp+vs+USA+g... ). How the size of an economy correlates wit
142.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
The difference is that the satellites' 230 W/m^2 is in a very narrow frequency band, and can thus be harvested and converted efficiently, where solar radiation is mainly at much higher frequencies, and, more importantly, spread out over a w
143.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
From the pdf at the bottom of the page: IF YOU INVEST $50, AND THE FILM IS... SOLD FOR $250,000 = YOU GET $50 (100% RETURN) SOLD FOR $500,000 = YOU GET $75 (150% RETURN) SOLD FOR $1,000,000 = YOU GET $88 (175% RETURN) I don't think traditio
144.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
To address your second concern, all quantum particles (this includes photons) have wavelike properties (including wavelength), and thus can show wavelike effects, such as interference. For example, a ray of light contains a huge number of p
145.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
Even if the loophole for books is smaller, the point is, it only has to be applied once by anyone anywhere, after which it can be shared freely like any other non-DRM'ed file. I'm not convinced that the total amount of internet sharing of a
146.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
In Belgium, all engineering students are put together first for three semesters of general introductory courses, after which students choose a major and a minor out of the classical engineering disciplines.
147.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
I think it would be better to delete the eintire paragraph above your addition, as the notion that this theorem guarantees at least one cyclone somewhere on earth is ridiculous.
148.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
Me personally, no, but I can imagine that this would be attractive to a small business. Anyhow, isn't the effort to port the app from being desktop-based to server-based minimal since all the interfaces are web-based?
149.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
another thought: maybe you could sell this as an app you can install on a (commercial) server of your choice, and so not have this drain your local (presumably home) bandwidth, while still being independent of google, flickr, etc. This woul
150.
▲
by
graphene
17y ago
the philosophy would be the main drawing point for me; it's precisely the reason I still keep all my photos, calndar information, files, etc. on my local machine, even though web-based access would be very nice to have. With you app, I can
More ›