graphene

21 ms·

151.
by graphene 17y ago
No, that's exactly my point; perhaps independent journalism, which doesn't seem viable given current economic patterns, can become self-sustainable through internet publishing and voluntary contributions by appreciative readers. There's ple
152.
by graphene 17y ago
I think this is less wacky than it sounds at first (I have a friend who pays for his hotmail account). Perhaps this model could save/revive professional journalism, by letting readers voluntarily contribute on a per-article basis?
153.
by graphene 17y ago
as for the proliferation of service comanies if they weren't exempted, I think the market should (and will) determine an appropriate supply of services, not the legislature. The fact that the bulk of these comanies will create negligible ex
154.
by graphene 17y ago
I wouldn't think so, because this applies only to capital gains tax, i.e. only becomes relevant when the company is sold. I don't think there would be any advantage in transforming departments into separate companies, and then cayying on as
155.
by graphene 17y ago
they should state that more clearly then, if that is their intention.. like this it seems to me as if an engineer who designs some important technological invention and starts a startup around it, would be excluded... Also, would it be that
156.
by graphene 17y ago
In most cases (and certainly your two examples) I would agree with you on "It is not for you to decide how I spend my resources". However, if you push it to the extreme, you can think of cases where I think society should be able to exert i