grahamnorton39

3 ms·

1.
by grahamnorton39 22d ago
Might be missing something —- are there any issues with Gemini 3.1 Pro that aren’t there in 2.5? I agree, though. 2.5 Pro is a great model. Very competent, knows a lot, and can process tons of text (and videos, and images, and audio too iir
2.
by grahamnorton39 1mo ago
(afaik) “peh-trick-ore” is how I’ve always said it
3.
by grahamnorton39 4mo ago
Ironic, too, that this entire article is littered with Claude-isms.
4.
by grahamnorton39 4mo ago
I just sort of subconsciously glossed over these, thinking they were very clever jokes I was too dense to get. Upon re- reading — yeah, it’s quite bizarre. It’s nailed the cadence, but completely butchered the content. The bit that sounds t
5.
by grahamnorton39 5mo ago
Or the thing where they have a bombastic display of numbers, rehashing either emphatically trivial information, or information presented elsewhere, as if they’re the most important figures in the universe. e.g. > *0* hedge fund owners. Z
6.
by grahamnorton39 6mo ago
For what it’s worth, gptzero.me rates it as entirely AI generated, with 100% confidence. It’s not perfect, but it’s a pretty strong signal. Certain aspects of how it’s structured and written do also seem AI-generated—for instance, the simul
7.
by grahamnorton39 8mo ago
Actually, sounds like it’s written entirely by an LLM, and so do their other comments
8.
by grahamnorton39 10mo ago
While hollow, it is also bad (and absurd) enough to be quite entertaining. It’s from an era where this wasn’t far off the state of the art for coming up with machine-generated text—context that makes it quite a bit funnier than if it were g