gpm

34 ms·

811.
by gpm 1y ago
What a strange comparison. If you're negotiating deals worth billions of dollars, or even just millions, I'd strongly suggest not doing so with a hangover.
812.
by gpm 1y ago
https://github.com/dscottboggs/rustteksto
813.
by gpm 1y ago
Yeah, that's probably a better way to describe the data model than what I did :)
814.
by gpm 1y ago
> Since jj does not have branches, it sounds like we are forced into the rebase environment? No, I tend to use rebase by default (because I like linear history) so its the language I use but it's equally valid in both git and jj to
815.
by gpm 1y ago
You're both working on the same branch on the remote? It will refuse to push unless you do `jj git push --force` at which point it will overwrite your coworkers work with yours. This is regardless of conflicts, like with git you have t
816.
by gpm 1y ago
If I understand you correctly we're imagining you pulled a repo with main at commit A. You added commit B on top of A. Someone else added commit C on top of A to main on the remote, and you're asking what happens? Nothing until yo
817.
by gpm 1y ago
What is/was "git5"? Git the vcs is only about to release version 3.0... Googling only reveals some gene that happens to be named that...
818.
by gpm 1y ago
Not 100% sure I understand what you're saying, but I think the answer is "yes". You can modify any* commit in `jj` regardless of whether it has commits on top of it at any time. Either by another commit into it, or by directl
819.
by gpm 1y ago
Because it's nicer tool to use. To borrow someone else's descriptions (paraphrased), it's simultaneously simpler than git and more powerful than git. Some things that were a source of friction in git (e.g. any non trivial reb
820.
by gpm 1y ago
I'm under the impression that seed only effects anything if temperature > 0. Or more specifically that the LLM given a sequence of input tokens deterministically outputs the probability for each possible next token, and then the onl
821.
by gpm 1y ago
> It has 2 compressors (1 for fridge and 1 for freezer) Is this a feature? It seems like making more parts to break. Surely there's a better way to get independent cooling control. E.g. one compressor with valves to control which si
822.
by gpm 1y ago
Judging by Judge Alsup's ruling even if the codes were copyrighted it would most likely not be copyright infringement to train on them either, and as such even if they are copyrightable and they do own copyright on them it remains beyo
823.
by gpm 1y ago
The focus on maps and gemini is hilarious. The first is literally the anti-use case, it's used when you're on the move, not when you're sitting still with a headset strapped to your face. The latter is one of the few computer
824.
by gpm 1y ago
Would the electrical conductivity be an issue?
825.
by gpm 1y ago
I thought windows had an unstable syscall interface?
826.
by gpm 1y ago
3D printer nozzles, which is sort of the opposite (industrial heating products). Part of the argument is that better heat conduction means that you can run the nozzle cooler resulting in less heat conduction to the cold side (above where yo
827.
by gpm 1y ago
I can see where you're coming from, but I think I'd prefer to describe practically all stable software as living in an unstable equilibrium in the usable region of state-space. When the stabilizing force of security patches, certi
828.
by gpm 1y ago
I don't think I'm entitled to an equivalent phone either. I merely think I'm entitled to either (at Apple's option) an equivalent phone OR apple not using it's monopoly on producing equivalent phones to extract furt
829.
by gpm 1y ago
There is a reference count in the algorithm in the sense that the algorithm must keep track of the number of live shared borrows derived from a unique borrow or owned value so that it knows when it becomes legal to mutate it again (i.e. to
830.
by gpm 1y ago
No I'm rather explicitly considering the joint behavior or the borrow checker and RAII. With only RAII you don't get the last reference part. Yes, there are exceptions, it's a roughly correct analogy not a precise description
831.
by gpm 1y ago
It seems less stable in the sense that 1. It literally remains stable for less time. Nine months instead of 5+ years, up to 12 if you pay them. 2. They apparently have a history of testing changes in it. 3. They appear to only sell things l
832.
by gpm 1y ago
I have to say I'm rather more worried about the apparent lack of testing that their auto-update mechanism is actually updating anything (given how long it took them to notice that symptom), than that they're replacing some softwar
833.
by gpm 1y ago
It's that as well , but that part of the description doesn't catch how objects are automatically freed once the last reference to them (the owning one) is dropped. Meanwhile my description doesn't fully capture how it guaran
834.
by gpm 1y ago
The borrow tracker tracks whether there is 1, more than 1, or no references to a pointer at any particular time and rust automatically drops it when that last reference (the owning one) goes away. Sounds like compile time reference counting
835.
by gpm 1y ago
Modern conveniences such as compiler support for - Tagged unions so you can easily and correctly return "I have one of these things". - Generics so you can reuse datastructures other people wrote easily and correctly. And a modern
836.
by gpm 1y ago
All phones aren't equivalent, we agree on that right? Apple has legitimate hardware advantages in places. Faster more energy efficient chips. Better earbuds. Various camera components with various advantages. So on and so forth. All of
837.
by gpm 1y ago
You're typing that on a Pixel with a bump sticking out the back, which would mean it doesn't violate the design patent. I wasn't specifically thinking of that case, though it's likely why my mind chose that sensor as an
838.
by gpm 1y ago
I'm not taking any issue with patents existing here. I'm taking issue with anti-competitive behavior that Apple is executing on top of the patent system. If Apple merely wanted to use their monopoly on features of devices to sell
839.
by gpm 1y ago
Equivalent in the way of having the numerous features small and large that Apple has patents on. Whether that's being a rectangle with rounded corners (yes they have a patent on that, or at least did, and successfully defended it in co
840.
by gpm 1y ago
I did not have a choice to buy another equivalent phone because patents legally forbid other companies from producing equivalent phones. If Apple wants to take that defence, they should be required to have abandoned every patent they own on

More ›