Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gph
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
20 ms
·
151.
▲
by
gph
9y ago
Why not have part of each grant be placed into a fund for replication studies, or even directly allocated to other independent teams to replicate the study. Might do some fields rather well.
152.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
Yea, but that's like restricting NYC to Manhattan. I wouldn't feel that unsafe walking the majority of Manhattan at night either. Or for another city center, I go downtown inner harbor/fells point/federal hill Baltimore
153.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
>may things improve for you, though I really have no idea how that will happen. I think a good first step would be changing attitudes towards drug use. We should treat users as patients instead of criminals. And waging a 'war'
154.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
I just don't see a) as happening much. If there are cheaper solar panel or electric cars available I don't see the point in a consumer not going with the competition. Unless Tesla intentionally makes it hard to integrate competito
155.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
This is just my opinion, but I think long term Tesla will lose out on solar panels to cheaper more focused competition. But they seem to be leading the way in battery production and self-driving automobiles. If they can hold on to market le
156.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
I feel like the only thing you did read was the headline... Westinghouse is a bit of a special case. There was accounting/financial fraud and they took on stupid fixed contracts that bit them in the ass when safety regulations forced t
157.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
>so if our government had our best interests in mind, then they'd pass those laws instead of repealing them. That is still a debatable issue though. I completely agree with you, but there are possible world views in which one might
158.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
I know it's stupid and crazy, but would carpet bombing the arctic work to burn up the methane trapped below the permafrost before it leaks out into the atmosphere and causes worse problems? Or maybe we should send out expedition crews
159.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
>We should support things that make sense and promote the reduction of income inequality. That need not be at odds with globalization, though many businesspeople tend to push it that way since it's cheaper and good for them. Doesn&#
160.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
So you're telling me I should support TPP, globalization efforts, and the subsequent concentration of economic and political power because you have a good feeling that humanity is heading in the right direction and we can invent some e
161.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
>There's no replacement for hard work. Not yet for physical health. But that saying kind of annoys me in a general sense given that the majority of technological advancement has specifically been to replace hard work we don't w
162.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
But you're describing some kind of theoretical ideal world. We don't live in that world. No one has found a good mechanism for controlling inequality within their own borders and/or ethnic group that scales to anything beyond
163.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
I always thought HOV lanes were a bit of a joke during rush hour or traffic jams. It's nearly impossible to effectively enforce the rule and there's simply too many people willing to ignore the rule.
164.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
Yep, just another person using data visualization techniques to describe their personal opinion while giving them the air of empirical authenticity. It's unfortunate really, the same as a media outlet using a misleading graph or junk d
165.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
Imagine if you could share annotations on a page between a certain facebook group you have, so instead of seeing a public comment annotation section you see only annotations from your group. Doesn't have to be facebook either, I'm
166.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
Not a bad rebuttal, I have to agree that Zuckerberg is trying to position Facebook as the end all be all of social contact in the future. I don't think that's a good solution. But in reference to this quote: >The reason we find
167.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO Read history outside of school, might learn a thing or two.
168.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
Maybe. Seems like the FBI and federal agencies were harassing dissidents a lot worse in the 60s and 70s through COINTELPRO than they are now. I don't know if it's really worse now so much as different with new avenues of harassmen
169.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
Yea, nice. The Government/Law enforcement harassing dissidents at the border is definitely equivalent to the Nazis rounding up and executing political and religious minorities. /s Not to make light of this issue, it's a serio
170.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
And considering that something like 0.01% of travelers into the US are ever affected by this, you could say in a practical sense there is no concern here either. That's basically a rounding error worth away from 0%. In fact it sounds m
171.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
I know it's hard looking back to see the good that was done, it certainly was for me at first glance. But if you remember Obama took over a severely damaged economy, one that many people at the time thought was on the verge of collapsi
172.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
>I just want to vote for a party that supports abortion rights, gun rights, a open Internet, and a generally smaller government (focused more on research and education). Request denied. Join a side and conform any of your conflicting ide
173.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
Pull that ladder up behind you, lest anyone should try to climb up there with you.
174.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
>But yeah, you can't really expect corporate ethics or laws to protect you. Sure, in a general sense you can't expect human morality or police to protect you all the time either. Do you just assume everyone you meet is a viol
175.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
>Steal, murder, take what you can, behave well only when someone forces you to? And the US is forcing China to. I'm not trying to hold one side up as some kind of moral victor. Yea China's doing the same thing the US would in t
176.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
Are you even having the same conversation as me? You are so into your anti-IP/DRM mindset its blinding you to the basic principle I'm getting at. I don't give a shit what you think about the current Copyright or IP laws we ha
177.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
There is no standard for developing an economy, you've just taken two similar instances in history and correlated them. Or did Japan, Germany, et al. develop their economy through industrial espionage and I just haven't learned ab
178.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
Sure there are theoretically better ways of doing things. If there are theoretically better ways of distributing food does that mean I get to go rob a grocery store? You can't flaunt the rules and regulations of world trade because you
179.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
If they are going to be part of the global economy then they need to accept the terms of the global economy. Yea their practices are mainly harming western countries at this point, but in the future maybe it's India or Singapore that h
180.
▲
by
gph
10y ago
> It's the US' problem to find what to sell. And only the US can solve it. Well there's the problem of China not respecting copyright or any type of intellectual property. And that's not just a problem for the Faceboo
More ›