Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gozo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
61.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
Engineering from first principle tells us that roads where cars interact with unprotected humans should have a limit of 20 mph. I'm not sure if this is such a road but overall, because of physics, speed isn't really up for debate.
62.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
Speed is not the problem. Highways are going to be the first sections of self-driving roads. Because they are simple predictable environments, which requires less hardware, where accidents have high costs, liability issues are small, trips
63.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
I think it's fine to take it personal, just don't take it out on yourself. Daniel Ek, founder of Spotify, is another Google reject.
64.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
Frankly I think discussions like these show how not all programmers are engineers. Cutting down on complexity and ambiguity is a good thing. Because even if you can handle something, when you have teams of 100+ people with 100 000+ lines of
65.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
Not sure if I should laugh or cry over that career change though...
66.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
I have a really hard time following this discussion. I assume you are against safe spaces, but isn't that pretty much what you're suggesting as a solution here? How is "insecurity" any sort of measurable standard that do
67.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
Hardware isn't the problem and hasn't been for some time, software is. Partly because Android is Linux for chip manufacturers. Once there is something software wise that enough people want to buy and use the hardware itself is, at
68.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
In-group behavior is not a good indicator in terms of being a meritocracy. Rather it indicates that people don't expect anyone to scrutinize them. Say there's a summit on internet governance and someone is making a point about thi
69.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
As part of the in-group I can think it's kind of funny in a "stick it to the man" kind of way. But considering that much of what let's the NSA do what it does is because of the failure of organizations like the IETF (and
70.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
Isopropanol + microfiber cloth? That's what I do at least.
71.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
So how do you explain the discrimination against Asian in elite university admissions?
72.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
Not that anyone would actually want to have a company in Albania, unless they had to. Bulgaria, Cyprus, Estonia, Gibraltar, Malta etc. are good options in Europe.
73.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
> The Winamp revival cannot come soon enough. Is this what you want? http://spotiamb.com/
74.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
With all due respect, and while you might very well be smart, your story is pretty normal. The MIT alumni I've meet (for which selection bias surely is a factor) has been quite beyond that and very much overachievers (in a positive way
75.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
Any idea if it is, or what is, actually patented? The hardware wouldn't be very hard to make if one can live with normal height keys.
76.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
> (From Article) Congress wants to phase out the use of the RD-180 engine for national security launches by 2019 as a result of Russia’s actions in Ukraine. I have't been paying close attention, but maybe you know this. Didn't
77.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
This board is based on a PIC. The teensy is a AVR (and later ARM). You want to look here instead: https://www.reddit.com/r/MechanicalKeyboards/wiki/firmware
78.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
You're just stating opinions. Why would that be interesting in this discussion? This is the Internet, there's no lack of opinions. You haven't responded with proper arguments to anyone is this thread, which seems to be consis
79.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
The author explains why he thinks the arguments aren't relevant. You might not agree with his explanation, but you can't just dismiss them as PC because you don't agree. > (From the article) But this is a straw man argumen
80.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
It's like everything else though. If you don't normally interact with a field you're only going to get the dramatic content. If you're a web developer you won't see the 99% of times Linus Torvalds is normal, because
81.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
You're account seems to have been hellbanned[0] since your first comment two and a half years years ago. I've vouched this comment and upvoted you. You will want to check if your next comment in visible with "incognito mode&q
82.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
I have "after Snowden" begin to doubt that. Sure, there is a lot of people who say they support privacy. But then a lot of the industry nowadays is based on shuffling peoples data around. So I wonder how "deep" peoples c
83.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
Someone always feels the need to point that out. That isn't the point here though. A lot of these offshore jurisdictions are used for dirty money from Russia, China and the Middle East. The reason the US has become a lot harder on offs
84.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
Not really things changes too quickly. You want to go to 13/14 on this map over HQB though. http://www.seeedstudio.com/document/pdf/Shenzhen%20Map%20for...
85.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
You can get decent tablets in China for $30-40. Not like a few years ago when everything low end was crap. Except cameras which usually isn't very good still. Of course it's hard to know what you are buying unless you have it in y
86.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
> Why does this need any kind of new change in the first place? The same reason as other FCC regulations, so you don't inadvertently pollute part of the spectrum with either transmissions or noise? One device might not be a problem,
87.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
I think part of the problem is that if you're a minority group which views the majority group don't think are important you will not only be judged as overreacting because they can't understand you, but you will also be judge
88.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
The problem I have with these kinds of comparisons is that they seem to compare with Silicon Valley and not European countries that overachive in terms of startup like, say, Sweden which isn't very close to SV culturally.
89.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
The argument in the top of this thread was that people who are sensitive to certain things should be filtered out of the admissions process based on that. I don't see how that isn't institutional discrimination. What if it include
90.
▲
by
gozo
11y ago
> The issue is that speech is now being suppressed in higher education settings -- a place where (otherwise lawful) offense is expected to be tolerated -- by students who don't respond to offense with the sort of counterargument you
More ›