gourao

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by gourao 10y ago

   That is a fair point, and most of the end users we work with are using k8s and mesos to deploy and run the applications. The issue I have with the article is that it assumes that a packaging tool is what defines the rest of your operationa
2. 2.▲
   by gourao 10y ago

   Docker is a packaging tool. How you chose to deploy your software package has nothing to do with your operational and DB administration procedures. Mixing the two topics is very confusing.
3. 3.▲
   by gourao 10y ago

   Interesting thought, however I think that the existing graph driver file systems are not actually an "image layer file system"... instead they are a general purpose file systems that are being used to store images. For example, wh
4. 4.▲
   by gourao 10y ago

   LCFS is not yet being used in production as far as I know We started building this because there are a lot of issues running containers in production, specifically around image space and inode management and also with page cash usage. This
5. 5.▲
   by gourao 10y ago

   Hi, I am one of the contributors on this project, and happy to answer any questions... LCFS will also be supporting the snapshot driver discussed here - https://github.com/docker/containerd/pull/484 . Curren
6. 6.▲
   by gourao 10y ago

   The tests were run against a local repository to remove network variability. Your comment on using docker pull to benchmark a file system perplexes me. This is not a general purpose file system, it is purpose built for only one use case -