gorklin

3 ms·

1.
by gorklin 12y ago
Way to back your claim with reason and evidence, SamReidHughes. You think coldtea is blathering? Prove it. There's a huge difference between "blathering", i.e. incoherence, and disagreement. If you truly find coldtea's c
2.
by gorklin 12y ago
Don't worry about it, they were people that were briefed on the relevant issues...
3.
by gorklin 12y ago
The software response to a "crypto ban" would be wide-scale steganography, I would guess pretending to be unencrypted HTTP. Good luck banning encryption!
4.
by gorklin 12y ago
Sure it will -- they could run it (at some loss of bandwidth) as a hidden service. When "my favorite site" gets court orders, they can take down their official server, and spin it up somewhere else behind a Tor hidden service. Ye
5.
by gorklin 12y ago
Good luck regulating my encrypted anonymized connection.
6.
by gorklin 12y ago
Should body chunks when using chunked encoding have their headers spread throughout the body, to have as much fidelity as possible? Or would you like the body to always appear whole regardless of transfer type?
7.
by gorklin 12y ago
Would it be okay if you could verify the whole process, but couldn't prove which way _you_ voted? One such scheme is outlined at https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/10/new_voting_pr...
8.
by gorklin 13y ago
I suppose this article faired poorly because of its length and a touch of the vague. I think the premise of an "ideal capitalist product" is either self-contradictory or ill-defined. The analysis of the digital panopticon, and its