gorby91

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by gorby91 2y ago

   Is there a particular paper to point to?
2. 2.▲
   by gorby91 2y ago

   For larger and more litigious companies like Nintendo one would think YouTube wouldn't continue to accept takedown requests from random unverified users
3. 3.▲
   by gorby91 2y ago

   I feel like tariffs may make the problem worse as the cheaper the battery, the smaller the tariff hit, and so people may be incentivised to go even further down the quality ladder
4. 4.▲
   by gorby91 3y ago

   Australia recently took a massive step backwards in this field, passing laws to allow courts to compel platforms to identify users who made allegedly defamatory posts. This was done under the dubious auspices of "preventing cyber bully
5. 5.▲
   by gorby91 3y ago

   To continue to overextend the analogy though, that's asking people to use Edge over Chrome or Firefox is like trying to market the Smart Car. Few people want to be seen driving it, fuel efficiency be damned.
6. 6.▲
   by gorby91 3y ago

   Money being collected and then paid back is not required for the government to be subsidising something. It is sufficient that's the revenue collection be foregone.
7. 7.▲
   by gorby91 4y ago

   Would they not have been effectively blocked by the concrete wall the capsule was embedded in?