goodmythical

6 ms·

31.
by goodmythical 1mo ago
You're still the product of your environment. You'd not be using words like 'uncritical', 'agentic', 'maximalist', 'cringe', 'cultivating' etc were you not. You're just as bra
32.
by goodmythical 1mo ago
Sorry for sharing my interest that the search was providing results based on recent forum activity.
33.
by goodmythical 1mo ago
Ho-ly. Curius, I searched: tomshardware requesting I download file and got: Recent reports from August 2026 indicate that users accessing Tom's Hardware on mobile browsers experienced unexpected file download requests (with a link to
34.
by goodmythical 1mo ago
I've noticed it being heavily used in non-native and accesibility type situations. To them, people who do not necessarily spend swathes of their day reading generated text, it does not sound any particular way other than "yes, thi
35.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
>they are orbital sanders that operate correctly only 95% of the time. The other 5% of the time they do the wrong thing and cause you to do more work and/or damage the wood So more of a home-gamer chainsaw? Except that I'm not
36.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
skill issue
37.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
i-use-arch-btw
38.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
I don't see how that's any more obvious than the suspicious claim that numbers can have only so many digits.
39.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
Are there countably many names? Countably say able, perhaps, but I don't recall seeing any limitation to word length in the spec. See: "Below is the full 189,819-lettered word for 'titin':" at https://cw
40.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
There are lots of funny "why do you speak like a man/woman" or "why do you speak like a children's cartoon/radio announcer/train conductor" examples in language learning forums. It always comes out th
41.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
Are there actually things that cannot be named? Any such thing could easily be assigned some such "Phenomenon 8x306Q". If any two people agree to call it that and use that to succesfully discuss the thing, then that is a name for
42.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
That's my standard response. "If Sunday's at the beginning, then there are two weekends per week."
43.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
My shelves all have two bookends. If they only had one, the books would fall off the end without a bookend. But, this is simply mataphorical reasoning. One cannot conflate weeks with bookshelves for many reasons.
44.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
You are conflating the work week with the week. ISO is but one standard. Dictionary.com, Merriam-Webster, and Cambridge all define the weekend as some derivation of "the end of the week". I'm also not sure how the various def
45.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
Does the policy somehow preclude you from using the remaining days before the beginning of June or end of May? Seems easy enough to dodge if it's not the case that the relative privacy outweighs the flys.
46.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
Monday as the beginning of the week is the only logically defensible position if you support the weekend. There is only one weekend. One end of the week. It goes at the end as it is definitionally required to do. If Sunday is the end of the
47.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
Makes sense with the whole "Ubuntu is sometimes translated as "I am because we are" thing as well
48.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
#section in italics because it contains a bug I've not yet fixed
49.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
>The whole private insurance system is a scam at every level. All for profit insurance must by definition bring in more than it pays out. From cars to homes to health to pets. If instead of paying all your premiums, you'd be far mor
50.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
>It will be cheaper to hire a couple security guards and buy a couple armoured cars This is still a possitive outcome brought from the presence of a threat to their lives. Not as positive as the healthcare thing, but it's still jobs
51.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
Wait, when did they take that away? I haven't touched MS in this decade, but I swear that used to be a thing at least through 7...
52.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
tl:dr no one streams lossless rips because lossy rips are smaller and therefore cheaper. Turns out lossy means you lose something.
53.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
>That’s how you end up with family feuds over centuries because at some point someone did not like someone else. This is a take it or leave it issue that will come down to personal preference. The small town mentality knows that this is
54.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
That seems like an implementation issue rather than a systemic one. There's no reason you couldn't do off 2 on 8 or off 3 on 7 or off 2 on 2 off on 2 off on 2 or off on 3 off on 2 off on 2 or off on 4 X2 or...just about anything..
55.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
everything is a token
56.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
Hasn't it been found that the best diet is the one you'll actually do? I seem to remember a meta analysis a decade ago or so finding that the particulars (high protein, atkins, paleo, whatever) didn't really matter so much as
57.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
Could be?: https://store.steampowered.com/app/665360/Comedy_Night/ edit, if you don't want to click steam the description says: About This Game: Singers, comedians, and entertainers the spotlight is your
58.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
I'm not sure that holds. If I crumble an assembled taco, I get nachos. If I crumble an assembled hot dog, I do not get nachos. If the two were equivalent, performing the same action on each should produce similar results. I suppose you
59.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
pleasedon'tdropmepleasedon'tdropmepleasedon'tdropmepleasedon'tdropme
60.
by goodmythical 2mo ago
em eye crooked letter crooked letter eye crooked letter crooked letter eye hump back hump back eye

More ›