good_stuffs

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by good_stuffs 1y ago

   Nobody even knows what AGI even is. This will most likely be defined by a corporation, not science. Due to obvious incentives.
2. 2.▲
   by good_stuffs 1y ago

   Phrasing seems a bit orchestrated, and seems like it's meant to get you to give up because it's happening no matter what. That video with "and this is dangerous to our democracy" comes to mind. Edit: Found it https:&#x2
3. 3.▲
   by good_stuffs 1y ago

   >If it does not work in software, it's not going to work in hardware. Aren't there limits to what can be simulated in software? Analog systems dealing with infinite precision, and having large numbers of connections between neu
4. 4.▲
   by good_stuffs 1y ago

   >B650 can even do 5.0 No AM5 chipset can do 5.0 speeds, they are all linked via x4 PCIe 4.0 lanes. What you're thinking about is PCIe 5.0 speeds from CPU to SSDs/GPU. There's no chipset that does PCIe 5.0 speeds, they are
5. 5.▲
   by good_stuffs 1y ago

   >Right, only the B650E chipset has official PCIe 5.0 support. There is no AM5 chipset with PCIe 5.0 support. They are all on PCIe 4.0. The lanes come from CPU, they go to SSDs/GPU/chipset. All AM5 chipsets are linked to CPU via
6. 6.▲
   by good_stuffs 1y ago

   >But it's not the hardware that's the difficult problem I think the problem is that we're still making the distinction between hardware and software. There isn't any. Or if we insist on it we have to deal with the von