gonvaled

66 ms·

691.
by gonvaled 10y ago
This would be fantastic!
692.
by gonvaled 10y ago
It is not legally binding, so nothing. But who would take responsibility of organizing that, disregarding the opinion of the majority of the British people? And what do you suggest, having a non-binding referendum until Remain wins? Out is
693.
by gonvaled 10y ago
They also paid tariffs, and micro-regulated what, how, when, and in what quantities could be imported / exported. Brexit will change that.
694.
by gonvaled 10y ago
If you are in a simulation you are not the one looking at the picture of the apple, and trying to eat it from the outside: you are the one for whom the only real thing is the apple that you have in front of you. And the apple indeed feeds y
695.
by gonvaled 10y ago
After so much campaigning, it seems plain clear that the UK is actually leaching in a big way from the EU. The UK is a sore player, only wanting to take part when there is a clear and direct benefit, is not happy to play by the rules, alway
696.
by gonvaled 10y ago
It gets even more interesting: these people support that individuals should be able to defend themselves against a zombie apocalypse with the argument (I assume) that "even though that is a very unlikely event, the consequences would b
697.
by gonvaled 10y ago
"Well regulated"
698.
by gonvaled 10y ago
Which have been vetted in their propietary algorithm, according to the wikipedia page. Dont know how well it works, though.
699.
by gonvaled 10y ago
Sorry, I indeed misunderstood you!
700.
by gonvaled 10y ago
The fact that you are even asking that is prove of the level of arrogance that the anglospeaking part of the world has reached.
701.
by gonvaled 10y ago
And surely the mongolian translation has been carefuly vetted like the original english one ... no offensive phrases in mongolian?
702.
by gonvaled 10y ago
If meaning of words is not important, I say let's default to Euskera.
703.
by gonvaled 10y ago
Why english?
704.
by gonvaled 10y ago
We in the west are so convinced that we are speking from high ground, that we go to the extreme to conflate western citizens with "high value people". We are thus not really worried about what happens to the rest of humankind: we
705.
by gonvaled 10y ago
> it's not their role to be the researchers, just the approvers of the people in command of the research. Poor Abdulah dies. He was just buying some groceries for his family, and was taken for Muhamed, who really looks like him, but
706.
by gonvaled 10y ago
> I assure you not everyone shares your opinion (as not everyone shares mine) I know. And the only thing I would like from you american leaders is to state this openly: we are only interested in defending our way of life, with wherever m
707.
by gonvaled 10y ago
Sorry but western media (of which this forum is a subset, whether you like or not), is strangely always extremely affected by all attacks performed against western targets, but usually completely oblivious to the attacks that western powe
708.
by gonvaled 10y ago
He is technically wondering how long until the first strike hits the US. He is highlighting the risk that the use of drones can get out of control. Sorry, but he is implying that the fact that currently so many innocent civilians are being
709.
by gonvaled 10y ago
> Black and white decisions are a luxury that not all people are afforded. Specially if you are in a hurry for dinner with your pals and you need to press that "yes, do drone strike" button in your mobile phone while you are ge
710.
by gonvaled 10y ago
> No if that ever happens i would just think karma is a bitch. Don't follow you. > I'm not a US citizen ... You still seem to be specially worried that drones will target "US persons of interest", which is what my
711.
by gonvaled 10y ago
Who is comparing what to carpet bombing? My comment is directly referring to the fact that american targets are something that worries the parent, but foreign targets (civilians) seem to not worry him/her that much. What do carpet bomb
712.
by gonvaled 10y ago
Which of course is the only bad thing about drone strikes, right? That they could ever hit the "right guys"? Who cares that hundreds of innocent civilians are killed, if they are not american citizens? Disgusting, really. EDIT, fo
713.
by gonvaled 10y ago
> Read this whole thing again; I never directly said that any of the allegations are not true. You should read again: > I want to be clear: the accusations of criminal sexual misconduct against me are entirely false.
714.
by gonvaled 10y ago
oooops! Thanks!
715.
by gonvaled 10y ago
(deleted because I used the wrong thread)
716.
by gonvaled 10y ago
Not, but it is relevant that there are so many Russian bashing reports in the media, while your system is probably as much crooked as theirs is. Which is of course just a confirmation of how completely rotted your system is, how much you th
717.
by gonvaled 10y ago
I hope that if your BI is only for citizens and since this is presumably financed by taxes, you are going to grant a big tax exemption to non Swiss nationals, since they (according to your plan) will have no chance of benefiting from BI. Wh
718.
by gonvaled 10y ago
> David Cameron has finally admitted he benefited from a Panama-based offshore trust set up by his late father. > Cameron also admitted he did not know whether the £300,000 he inherited from his father had benefited from tax haven sta
719.
by gonvaled 10y ago
Which applies in exactly the same manner to the mentioned Spanish politicians too.
720.
by gonvaled 10y ago
I would say let the UK leave the EU and let's ban financial transactions with the British-run network of global tax havens.

More ›