golol

21 ms·

271.
by golol 3y ago
> There are certain things I could do which would make me mean or disrespectful to you, like to make a parody of your work, but none of them go so far in being immoral that you should have any legal power to stop me from doing them. Bein
272.
by golol 3y ago
> If what you said is correct then why do things like this happen? You misunderstand what I am saying. I am interested in finding a way to deploy genAI that has no copyright issues from the commercial deployment side. I am not saying tha
273.
by golol 3y ago
Truth is, there are many platforms where you can distribute your works very effectively while ads are being shown, so there is at least competition, severalarket squares. There are also many ways to distribute your works lrss effectively wh
274.
by golol 3y ago
Well I am focusing in the commerical distribution aspect here, not the training aspect. Furthermore, for the case of image generators one could easily imagine that Midjourney could use only publicly and legally viewable/accessible artw
275.
by golol 3y ago
There's a certain prevalent belief that I consider a fallacy, which is that if A profits from B, then that must be to the detriment of B and B is being exploited. Irregarding of whether midjourney is exploiting the authors, the author
276.
GenAI should be as copyright-okay as search
3 points by golol 3y ago|9 comments
277.
by golol 3y ago
More specific tasks: - Go on Linkedin or fiverr and look at the kinds of jobs being offered remote right now. developer, HR, bureaucrat, therapeut, editor, artist etc. Current AI agents can not do the large majority of these jobs just like
278.
by golol 3y ago
- passing a hard Turing test, adversarial and with a duration of a few weeks and comparing with 10th percentile humans. - being a roughly human equivalent remote worker. - having robust common sense on language tasks - having robust common
279.
by golol 3y ago
Why define AGI like that? General intelligence is supposed to be something like human intelligence. You are talking about ASI.
280.
by golol 3y ago
>The function has to be continuouss. That's not a problem. You can show that neural network induced functions are dense in a bunch of function spaces, just like continuous functions. Regularity is not a critical concern anyways. &gt
281.
by golol 3y ago
Funnily, for me intuition is the part of intelligence which I can more easily imagine as being done by a neural network. When my intuition says this person is not to trust I can easily imagine that being something like a simple hyperplane c
282.
by golol 3y ago
Afaik his small bot reaches 1300 and gpt-3.5-instruct reaches 1800. We have no idea how much and on what kind of PGNs the Openai model was trained. I heard a rumor that they specifically trained on games up to 1800 before but no idea.
283.
by golol 3y ago
> I am pretty sure a bunch of matrix multiplications can't intuit anything. I don't understand how people can say things like this when universal approximation is an easy thing to prove. You could reproduce Magnus Carlsen'
284.
by golol 3y ago
I agree with you. Turing machines make sense and I can extend my intuition to a general idea of "dynamical systems can peroform computation", but I have no idea how quantum computing fits in there.
285.
by golol 3y ago
Could one say that they are basically performing certain physical experiments with particles, and obtaining measurements which would be extremely hard to obtain via classical simulations? Or is that a mischaracterization?
286.
by golol 3y ago
Well that makes sense, but I wanted to push against the result that the OP seems to take away from their test, which was that Marginalia seems to work well for the common user.
287.
by golol 3y ago
The launch prices haven't changed all that much and SpaceX is raking in margin.
288.
by golol 3y ago
I just tested Mariginalia and it was completely unable to lead me to a Wikipedia or imdb page when searching for "driver ryan gosling" and variations. It just listed lots of random articles.
289.
by golol 3y ago
But isn't that the users problem? Also with a smarter reverse image search you can detect an infringement with similar reliability as to using google images.
290.
by golol 3y ago
How about this: Image generators should be treated like random google image search. They sample randomly from the distribution of publicly viewable images. Google does it exactly while Image generators do it in an interpolative way. Google
291.
by golol 3y ago
>why would any sane person want to create something that not only could be stolen and redistributed sans attribution, but that would be? Well it wouldn't work with current business models, but maybe something would emerge? Some indi
292.
by golol 3y ago
But telling my friend about it is the production and transfer of a copy to a third party, just with a certain amount of information loss.
293.
by golol 3y ago
Hmmm good point, I was going to say ownership of physical things can be treated fundamentally differently from ownership of information, but in a theoretical less and less physically grounded world that doesn't seem like the right con
294.
by golol 3y ago
Well I definetly think there is a contradiction of too absurdities here, because if I read your book how could you forbid me to tell my friend about it?
295.
by golol 3y ago
I agree of course but may I say that your phrasing sounds like maybe 80% ChatGPT lmao.
296.
by golol 3y ago
I probably used the wrong words, buy instead of copyright maybe I mean exactly ownership of information, that is, intellectual property.
297.
by golol 3y ago
Well we live in a world where cryptographic methods exist so solving identification and attribution is theoretically possible without any laws.
298.
by golol 3y ago
But I'm not talking about legality, I'm talking about what we should make the law to be. Just imagine memory implants become commonplace, shouldn't they be allowed to store copyrighted media you have consumed? If not how do y
299.
by golol 3y ago
This interpretation of copyright only made sense while the transfer and storage of information was tied to physical objects. That time is long and we dont consider it infringement to remember a media or reproduce it at home. Furthermore, we
300.
Ask HN: What would a world without copyright look like??
6 points by golol 3y ago|23 comments

More ›