godelski

39 ms·

631.
by godelski 8mo ago
It could be a difficult battle for them to fight. We'd just have to make it too costly. Make them go hunt down all the relays. Scatter them everywhere. A $5 ESP32 isn't a good relay but they still have to hunt it down and that&#x2
632.
by godelski 8mo ago
> This situation where they're the steward of the only non-Google browser is not tenable, something needs to change. So what, you're going to help Google shove the knife in deeper? Idk man, seems like a bad way to fight
633.
by godelski 8mo ago
Okay, so in your version who is Google? And chromium?
634.
by godelski 8mo ago
I've read this three times now and still don't understand you. Do you think people don't update their software? Are you just counting every update as people happy about the kill switch? There'll be so much noise in that
635.
by godelski 8mo ago
What is the bad kind that Firefox is shoving in? Do they have any good kind? What's the ratio?
636.
by godelski 8mo ago
Sure, but then the people complaining would need to recognize that that's not happening. All the AI features are local models. The only thing not local is that side window you can open that can connect to a chatbot. It's also easy
637.
by godelski 8mo ago
There's also a side window you can open that can connect to a chatbot. There's translation (on device). Also semantic history search.
638.
by godelski 8mo ago
> This is like a restaurant that releases a new feature that they will no longer defecate in your food. Thank god, at least there's one restaurant not serving literal shit. You're analogy works but you can't forget
639.
by godelski 8mo ago
Most people aren't vocal. Most people who are vocal aren't representative of users. Many vocal people aren't even users. Don't get me wrong, I turn off telemetry, but you're acting like it's easy to get that in
640.
by godelski 8mo ago
The other thing people can do is install Firefox and use it. An uptick in user share also serves as a metric to reinforce the move. Let's be honest, most people complaining are using chrome or some flavor. But current Firefox users cou
641.
by godelski 8mo ago
Firefox does what some people want, people complain. Firefox does what other people want, people complain. Firefox does what both people want, people complain. I'm sorry, but we'll never get corporations to do what we want if we d
642.
by godelski 8mo ago
> It also bans jailbreaking/rooting your device, and requires GooglePlay Services/IOS equivalent be installed to "prevent tampering". Regulatory capture at its finest. Such a ruling gives Apple and Google a du
643.
by godelski 8mo ago
> Second, if all it takes to get into underage spaces is not being verified, predators *will* notice and exploit this hole. Well the default state is "assume underage". So the default state is be in same location as chi
644.
by godelski 8mo ago
> Way too many rewrites fail because people try to "improve" things during the port I'd say that porting is a great time to "improve" many things, but like you suggest, not a great time to add new feature
645.
by godelski 8mo ago
I used to work as a physical engineer and a common task is "where's that tool?" People leave things at their work station and they float around and well... you can't keep track of things you can't see. Manager final
646.
by godelski 8mo ago
I think some people frame Yak shaving as a bad thing but I'm not sure it always is, and often even it is it is bad because you're resolving debt. The example with Hal is funny, repeatable (I share it frequently), but also the task
647.
by godelski 8mo ago
Fwiw it works in zsh and I believe ksh (haven't checked). There's not many people that run csh, tcsh, sh, ksh, or even fish. I could be more pedantic but I'll trade for practicality. I'm sure we could even do better than
648.
by godelski 8mo ago
You're right and I still don't understand your point.
649.
by godelski 8mo ago
Depends what your research question is, but it's very easy to spoil your experiment. Let's say you tell it that there might be small backdoors. You've now primed the LLM to search that way (even using "may"). You pa
650.
by godelski 8mo ago
It's a pretty common threshold, like 10% is. Be it the 80/20 "Pareto" rule, it's the value of one finger on one hand, or if you really want you stretch the p-value of 0.05 is 1 in 20 odds but that's definitely
651.
by godelski 8mo ago
Yeah that's a good addition. I think often the words we use can really make things more confusing. Like I hate when people say invertible but in reference to a function that isn't bijective. Why not say reversible? (No complaints
652.
by godelski 8mo ago
Okay so doesn't work for fish or dash but who is using those? More importantly, who is using those and doesn't know how to convert? It really just seems like you're trying to start a fight and I don't know why. If you&#x
653.
by godelski 8mo ago
That bar has no lower bound though so of course we're talking past one another Also we're talking about an esp32. They aren't magic
654.
by godelski 8mo ago
It's extra sad because they would be more profitable if they recognized this. Sometimes I wonder why companies are so resistant to making profits. It can be really strange. To be so profit focused yet throw away so much just because it
655.
by godelski 8mo ago
> Because the liars who have already profited from lying will defend the current system. Okay? And so we just have to deal with it? Give up? Throw in the towel? Not push back? > repealing the 17th amendment Did you re
656.
by godelski 8mo ago
> the attacker could inject additional malicious commands when curl'd directly to bash There's another issue actually. You're streaming, so ask yourself what happens if the stream gets cut prematurely. I'll gi
657.
by godelski 8mo ago
Sure, but now we're not playing code golf. There's much better commands than the ones I wrote but good luck getting people to run them
658.
by godelski 8mo ago
Everything I wrote works in bash and zsh. I think this is going to be fine for the vast majority of people. Tbh, I'm not sure what isn't portable, or at least not portable for everything that the curl-pipe-bash pattern doesn'
659.
by godelski 8mo ago
> But cutting down to 2 million 3 bit parameters or something like that would definitely be possible. Sure, but there's no free lunch > Hey look what I just found I've even personally built smaller "L&quo
660.
by godelski 8mo ago
> built out of redstone in minecraft Ummm... > 5 million parameters Which is a lot more than 888kb... Supposing your ESP32 could use qint8 (LOL) that's still 1 byte per parameter and the k in kb stands for thousand

More ›