globalgobble

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by globalgobble 10y ago

   Dude. I have worked with UNIX like systems most of my prof. career. I have migrated to the "dark'side just recently (3 y ago). They are both just tools to get the job done.
2. 2.▲
   by globalgobble 10y ago

   Brilliant answer :-). I totally agree with you. But this is the problem..you cannot implement such a thing to a tool like sysadminarena. Actually I believe being a sysops/devops or whatever you want to call it is one of the "most&
3. 3.▲
   by globalgobble 10y ago

   Sorry I have to disagree here as well. I do not think the time or number of commands or typos should be measured. I do not think you can do any quantification here. I believe a lot of sysadmins (talking about unix) do w;uptime;inspect syslo
4. 4.▲
   by globalgobble 10y ago

   I strongly disagree. We should not test edge cases and specific scenarios. We are trying to test the candidate and his abilities in daily tasks. If I say I use vi instead of "commands" I will probably solve most of the "text&
5. 5.▲
   by globalgobble 10y ago

   Please allow me my honesty but that's a stupid way of thinking about candidates and the roles. Or I do not get it. So you are basically going to judge the candidate based on what criteria ? If they use vi instead of cat to append to a
6. 6.▲
   by globalgobble 10y ago

   I am not sure you can do this I believe sysadmin/sre/devops person wears too many hats. What are you going to test ?
7. 7.▲
   by globalgobble 10y ago

   I am so shocked you call this poorly. Well I am sure americans are used seeing incredibly big numbers but for me this is hardly something I would call a poorly results. Gosh...the entire company has more money than some countries.