gizzlon

53 ms·

661.
by gizzlon 13y ago
And more likely to disclose it perhaps? There are a lot of breaches that you will never hear about because they go undetected or undisclosed.
662.
by gizzlon 13y ago
With that many servers you probably have to reboot a few of them pretty often.. You'd have to live in the datacentre :)
663.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Well, isn't it hard to make a startup take off without ever physically interacting with other people? A few years ago I was writing my master's thesis, and because I was in a hurry at the end and I didn't have any lectures I was spending a
664.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Surely there's 3G, 4G or whatever coverage? The forest is probably pretty close to Stockholm
665.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Wow, props for going "all the way". I have to wonder though, is this a wise choice? If the product alone, e.g. the code, is what drives investment it surely is.. But I would guess that's only one of many factors. People are scared away from
666.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Wow, that looks really cool :)
667.
by gizzlon 13y ago
I'll take that as a "yes" ;) AFAIK, neither signatures or "something you have, know" alone fixes replay attacks. Since this is a well known problem in cryptography, many solutions exists. All of which are probably overkill for this use.
668.
by gizzlon 13y ago
What are the benefits of doing this instead of just requiring authentication with every request? Is it because the authentication part is a lot of work for the server or client? Is it for the negligible (in this context) security benefits o
669.
by gizzlon 13y ago
I get that you can expire it, and that helps, but it's not the same as use-once. Of course, just using a timeout is probably fine in many cases, especially if it's used with SSL. But replay attacks are still possible since there's a windows
670.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Doesn't this open you up to replay attacks though? Since you can't store that a token was already used..
671.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Sounds more like a people problem than a email problem :)
672.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Does it make sense to think bout this as a "library" (you pull in what you need)? Contrary to the Bootstrap framework (fill in the missing pieces)?
673.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Most sensible websites don't use MD5 anymore What makes you say that? Do you mean new sites or all site? Got anything to back it up? I would guess most sites in existence use MD5, SHA1 or similar with 1 round, because it was (is?) very
674.
by gizzlon 13y ago
How Perl-compatible is pcre nowadays? Does it implement all the regular expression features in Perl?
675.
Voddler (suposedly) let's you upload DVD rips and share them with your frinds(voddler.com)
1 points by gizzlon 13y ago|0 comments
676.
by gizzlon 13y ago
"my assumption is that whatever they hate is simply the same thing they fear in themselves." I sort of dislike murdering paedophiles.. I guess that means.. uhm..
677.
by gizzlon 13y ago
The person using Excel doesn't have to be the person writing the sql :) This could we useful to integrate Excel sheets & data with other systems without too much manual intervention.
678.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Can you use it with arbitrary sql (non MS) servers on other hosts?
679.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Why is that? https://github.com/angular/angular.js/blob/master/src/Angula...
680.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Took his advice and opened up a random angular source file. Found this fun, little snippet: // String#toLowerCase and String#toUpperCase don't produce correct results in browsers with Turkish // locale, for this reason we need to dete
681.
by gizzlon 13y ago
If we for a second assume this is happening, I can't decide if it's worrisome development or something I should try to exploit..
682.
by gizzlon 13y ago
What's wrong with BerkleyDB, Tokyo Kabinet, Kyoto Kabinet, LevelDB .. ? It's a real question because I haven't actually used them. SQLite is fine, but if you don't need sql they probably fare better.
683.
by gizzlon 13y ago
If you actually need something like this, there's Kyoto Cabinet, BerkleyDB and others that are well known and well tested. Why use something new with no apparent benefits? (and a lot of drawbacks) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_DB
684.
by gizzlon 13y ago
Bigger opportunities. TV/print ads are pretty much "played out" and nothing earth-shattering is going to happen in that area [0]. Online is still relatively new.. who knows what will happen :) [0] Maybe it could. And should. But I guess mos
685.
by gizzlon 13y ago
I would if I used it a lot.. Extensive ads ruin a lot of webpages to the extend that I just stay away.. Yes, I know I could use adblock etc., which helps, but the design and layout is still much worse than it could be. It's worth paying a s
686.
by gizzlon 13y ago
What did you buy? And from where? Just looked at dx.com and they have a lot.. but not too many with android 4
687.
by gizzlon 13y ago
human.io was cool and has a lot of potential.. did it just go offline? :'( http://human.io
688.
by gizzlon 13y ago
I see it more as a move from "one size fits all" to more specialized tools. The term "nosql" is pretty useless as it's way too general. Both your comments about "not implementing the hard stuff", and GP's about schema, only applies to some
689.
by gizzlon 13y ago
30,000 people per year in the US die of alcohol related accidents That's kind of irrelevant since alcohol is much more widely available and used. The question is, what would happen if [insert drug] was legal and widespread? What effects
690.
by gizzlon 13y ago
For comparison: http://www.postgresql.org/search/?q=join&a=1&submit=... http://www.sqlite.org/search?q=join

More ›