Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gizmondo
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
> You completely destroy a 90b company because of these two reasons? Hanlon's razor aside, maybe that was the intention.
62.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
> even if it's not true, it reflects poorly to have this kind of relationship with your sister that she'd say this People making false accusations against you reflects poorly on _you_ now? What a world to live in.
63.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
I don't think the board is trying to rehire him though, more like being pressured to do so against their wishes.
64.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
When I was young I hated that my parents made me learn an instrument. As an adult I still hate that they did that, there is no value in it for me. There are parents that pursue their own interests through their kids (who often can't re
65.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
An alternative hypothesis is that it's done because it has always been done, and the fine motor skills thing is merely an attempt to rationalize this practice.
66.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
I skimmed both articles and they seem to be about anti-trust, which is orthogonal to the relevance-revenue conflict you described. Have I missed anything, or did you think a random unrelated fact proves your point somehow?
67.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
> I've never worked at Google, but I would bet that part of their induction is to train their employees how to combat these ideas. You'd lose the bet. Rather I think the entire topic of monetization is glossed over.
68.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
> Everyone, including you, has read at least one text while driving. No.
69.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
Heard a joke from a biologist: "if it's published in Nature, doesn't mean it's not true".
70.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
It has been peer reviewed - lots of scientists reviewed the paper, found various problems, some are trying to replicate it with varying success so far, some are looking for theoretical explanation. This is the essence of science, not sendin
71.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
This is the story of the Chernobyl disaster as well. There had been two similar accidents preceding it, in 1975 at the Leningrad NPP and in 1983 at the Ignalina NPP. Only after the second one the design flaws were well understood, but they
72.
▲
by
gizmondo
3y ago
My favorite part is that MMT advocates (like the author) were arguing for years "we should borrow and spend like there is no tomorrow, deficits don't matter as long as inflation is low". And now when it's suddenly not lo
73.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
You missed the important part - they added the ability to borrow while valuing collateral at cost. Previously it had to be valued at market price, which was not sufficient for SVB (because it was insolvent on the mark-to-market basis).
74.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
Look, it's a meme, you're not supposed to take them seriously. The guy is an executive at SVB Securities, a separate branch that is completely fine.
75.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
Actually a lot of depositors would be happy with a narrow bank that takes no risk, just holds the money at the Fed. But the Fed decided it's too safe so narrow banking is essentially banned. Seems fair if they ensure safety of deposits
76.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
Everyone will now act as if all deposits are insured, because the authorities demonstrated that it's true. This in turn will make any other decision in the future even harder, it's kinda self fulfilling prophecy. Seriously, you&#x
77.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
Why bother? It seems all deposits are in fact insured regardless of what rules say.
78.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
> Where do I sign up to play with these levels of leverage of other people's money too? Presumably you apply for a banking license, commit a lot of capital and subject yourself to countless onerous regulations (with more to come, as
79.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
Correct me if I'm wrong, but nowadays any (sufficiently large?) solvent bank can just borrow from the Fed and survive such a run.
80.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
> It seems like their opportunities to license the tech to actual car companies are pretty limited, as most of them seem to have competing efforts (and it’s not like any of them are so wildly profitable that Waymo could somehow capture m
81.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
I wonder how the first camp reconcile their views with the current struggle Italy has with their debt caused by excessive deficit spending in the past.
82.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
> C++ is performance first at any price. Hence UB. I don't think this is entirely correct, C++ in some cases famously preferred ABI compatibility over maximum performance.
83.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
> That sounds silly but does nobody find it at all odd that every fomc rate decision is entirely arbitrary whether they go 25, 50, 75 or more and yet cnbc predicts the exact rate decision every time? That's because the Fed communica
84.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
> IMO, I think the "meat in a vat" system where animal tissue is grown in some kind of factory setting is a much better approach. It's a better approach if it's economically viable. And there are doubts it ever will b
85.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
I think that was always the main argument against MMT prescription "spend like there is no tomorrow if the inflation is low". Politicians and population love only this part and will ignore/fight the other one.
86.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
Putting the antitrust issue aside, it seems to me some people want the owners of the businesses to be similar to NFT owners. Some symbolic notion of possession with no rights. Comparing dividends with arson, seriously? It's more like m
87.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
You can short it if you think it definitely won't reproduce. Otherwise it's not clear why adding billions to the market cap is unwarranted.
88.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
With p=0.00005 it's very unlikely to be a statistical fluke.
89.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
Which math books were banned for being too woke? Are they good?
90.
▲
by
gizmondo
4y ago
So what? Real humans at the professional level are so much better than any casual player, it makes no difference in experience for the latter. You'll hopelessly lose every single time.
More ›