gitaarik

40 ms·

841.
by gitaarik 3y ago
You can fix that in other ways that doesn't block access to all extensions. Like yeah even just a checkbox to enable experimental extension support like "[] I understand Firefox can become slower from unsupported extensions I inst
842.
by gitaarik 3y ago
What? You are saying that the `about:config` feature only exists in Firefox for historical and backward compatible reasons? And Firefox rather actually doesn't want to provide people the ability to easily override advanced configs? I t
843.
by gitaarik 3y ago
SVN doesn't do very good conflict resolution. It especially becomes more of a problem when you have multiple people working on several branches, that might want to merge some of each other's work. Apart from this, git also came wi
844.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Don't the snapshots make it much faster than without?
845.
by gitaarik 3y ago
What? Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but are you saying that absense of git knowledge is not a factor for career possibilities? I guess it depends on the kind of job..
846.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Isn't this the case with git? If you only do basic stuff I think you don't need more than 10 commands. And if you wanna go more advanced, you have the other commands and flags. Git has also added some new commands like `switch` to
847.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Surprise us
848.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Would seem to me that scammy adds negatively impact the reputation of your product. Makes it easier for a competitor to gain traction "I rather use Y, much safer and more reliable than YouTube".
849.
by gitaarik 3y ago
They can review the add companies and the adds they want to place. Also you can only review an active add when it gets X amount of flags.
850.
by gitaarik 3y ago
You are paying Google because they will otherwise allow your parents to be scammed by their adds?
851.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Yes, that is why the government needs to make better regulations so people are safeguarded against Google / Apple malware.
852.
by gitaarik 3y ago
How did you get that idea?
853.
by gitaarik 3y ago
So does that mean that the majority of X's visitors believe in Alex Jones' theories? Or they think he should have a voice regardless of his false / misleading theories?
854.
by gitaarik 3y ago
The alternative is to just be authentic and not put up a fake show.
855.
by gitaarik 3y ago
If you mean with "lives improved" that they have locked people into their products, spying on them, profiling them, making us into their product for them to make lots of money from, yeah, you're totally right.
856.
by gitaarik 3y ago
If you think you can trust Google because they are not interested in robbing your bank account, then you have fallen well for their deceptive campaigns. Google is just a next level robber that operates on corporate level.
857.
by gitaarik 3y ago
From all our arguments I think it's obvious that Lit has less lock-in than any other framework we discussed. If you find it so important to prove your point, why don't you make an exstensive comparison of all the discussed framewo
858.
by gitaarik 3y ago
That is a slight layer upon simple JavaScript string templates, nothing compared to JSX I would say Edit: hint: that is why Lit's library is also much smaller
859.
by gitaarik 3y ago
SSR, context and tasks are all separate packages, not in the Lit core package. The others are very basic functionalily for what you expect from a framework like Lit. It has to do something ultimately :D
860.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Sorry but I think it is quite obvious that a large framework will create much more lock-in and dependency than a tiny library. The more specific stuff you use, the more you are locked in. And yeah Lit still does some things for you so there
861.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Any technology has issues and limitations. Many basic browser functionalties also don't work with the React workflow, and Lit brings those things back again, making it more native, and less need for framework code. It seems you are onl
862.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Well, any popular framework has all these things, and most frameworks have a lot more. Lit is really the littlest amount of tools you would want. With less than that, you can just as well directly use the web component APIs, and not use a f
863.
by gitaarik 3y ago
I will read those links you referenced later. But what I think about the Shadow DOM is that that is for me actually the killer feature. That prevents a lot of weird issues. But it also brings limitations to methods of how web developers are
864.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Well, if Stencil is a Web Component framework using native Web Component technologies and strategies, transferring from Lit to Stencil will probably be a lot easier than from React to Angular or something. And there are actually not that ma
865.
by gitaarik 3y ago
They don't break semantics, input fields work just fine within a single Shadow DOM. You have to understand that a different library has a different workflow. If you addopt the correct workflow, you won't have any of the issues you
866.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Performance? Yeah there was once a time that Chrome was a bit snappier than Firefox, but nothing significant. I think it's mostly the placebo effect of people just thinking they are using a faster/slower browser. Development of de
867.
by gitaarik 3y ago
For me it's a perfect replacement for React. I've been using it for years, and I'm much more happy about it than React. And I was already very happy with React compared to before that. I think it's the logical next step,
868.
by gitaarik 3y ago
That is why we have a library to make it easier to work with these low level functions: Lit. And because Lit uses these functions, it can be a lot more lightweight compared to React & Angular etc.
869.
by gitaarik 3y ago
Cool solution. I'm using Lit, and implemented a different approach to this problem. I created a way to easily apply a set of styles to particular components, by using a mixin class: const myStyles = litStyle(css`h1 { color: red; }`); c
870.
by gitaarik 3y ago
I think you are trying to impose a React workflow on Web Components. Some things that work in React indeed don't work in Web Components / Lit, but that is usually for good reasons. There are a lot of quirks with React too, for exa

More ›