3 ms·
That is a slight layer upon simple JavaScript string templates, nothing compared to JSX I would say Edit: hint: that is why Lit's library is also much smaller
by gitaarik 3y ago
That is a slight layer upon simple JavaScript string templates, nothing compared to JSX I would say
Edit: hint: that is why Lit's library is also much smaller
- troupo 3y agoI: list all the custom things that lit has I: ask to show me how converting from lit to something else is easier as you claim You: ignore everything completely and answer a question literally no on asked, and pretend that the only custom thing is the DSL. Yup. My choice to completely ignore you in a sibling discussion was correct. On the other hand, after a few years of engaging with web component defenders, propoenents and propagandists I'm not surprised in the least. This behaviour is on par with the rest of them.
- gitaarik 3y agoFrom all our arguments I think it's obvious that Lit has less lock-in than any other framework we discussed. If you find it so important to prove your point, why don't you make an exstensive comparison of all the discussed frameworks?