Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gingerrr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
121.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
I don't think you understand the difference between "acquaintanceship" and "friendship". If you don't genuinely like someone you're acquainted with, you're not being a friend when you pretend you do.
122.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
Well, the article also quotes someone saying the aging reversal so far has seemed to be permanent, somehow "resetting gene expression". if it works more than the one time, potential immortality?
123.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
Lol feel better now that baby made a boom boom? Surprise: people read things that are hard/irritating to read when they're supposed to contain good lessons. Sometimes even more than once. Case in point: the bible. You're a wa
124.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
which part of the 73 page absurdly boring John Galt monologue do you want me to quote to prove you wrong? also, I don't care if you don't believe me. if you were really randian you would know that reality exists regardless of your
125.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
I've read it several times. Gross.
126.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
The day I realized this was the day my Theology professor in high school asked us, "Why wasn't the Big Bang just God pressing play?" Jesuits will survive and prosper long after movements like Quiverfull because they actually
127.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
It's certainly enforceable by banning.
128.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
You're probably right that he believes his own lies. The type of people to exclaim "I've never done anything wrong in my entire life" (as Scarcella does in the article) are usually the biggest buyers of their own bullshi
129.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
My personal variant has always been "learning to code is easy, you just have to be okay with feeling completely stupid for a while until it clicks." It's a way to encourage while being up front with the amount of time and men
130.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
Yeah, and the "slippery slope" argument is called a fallacy for a reason.
131.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
THIS! I'm shocked to see so few comments discussing the amount of mental overhead syntax highlighting helps you avoid. Without syntax highlighting, I have to keep the contextual meaning of every character I read in state mentally, and
132.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
This is the best pithy response to this argument I've seen, thanks. Can't wait to bust it out next time.
133.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
Nobody is disputing that Twitter can do whatever it wants, in fact that's exactly the point that (GG)GP is making - why should Twitter have a responsibility to anyone to do anything about hate speech on its site? The author of the link
134.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
It's surely free speech to write articles suggesting free speech be curtailed. It's also free speech to disagree with censorship. What's your point? (GP didn't seem to be expressing an issue with the article having been
135.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
"childish" != "infantilizing". Cute whimsical silly graphics are fun. Feeling like I've walked into a padded room/kindergarten when I hit their homepage due to the visual/copy combination is not fun.
136.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
The problem: > The internet has been stolen from you. Scooped out of your hands without much of a fuss. A small number of corporations are locked in a zero-sum game of land grabs. The solution: > The solution is to decentralize furthe
137.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
ITT: people who expect a language to work just like they want it to instead of reading the docs for the language.
138.
▲
by
gingerrr
10y ago
A statement made that leaves out pertinent information in order to suggest a different conclusion than would be reached with the information is an implicitly false statement. Logic is fun, kids.
139.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
You said this so much better than I did. Thank you!
140.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
I understand the reasons why the company would choose to do it. My argument is that they are fixing the wrong problem - and to be honest, could likely be making it worse. If so many unqualified candidates are making it to the phone screen
141.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
Using a coding test as the initial barrier to even a phone screen is what I have a severe problem with. I think coding tests absolutely have their place - after a 30m high-level skillcheck over the phone, let's ask for a brief 30-45m t
142.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
I'm not sure the lack of an explanation from the company really means anything here. Most companies, especially the more risk-averse, will not tell you why you were let go unless there are clearly-documented performance milestones that
143.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
Consider "fronty-backy-samey-samey" stolen
144.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
This is the biggest question I have as well. Will be interesting to see how they differentiate themselves, Hired has been providing this anonymized, salary-first hiring platform for a few years now. I hate to ask how Woo plans to "disr
145.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
I completely agree with your point, just wanted to say as a sidenote I think the word you wanted is "flout" rather than "flaunt".
146.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
> startups making fun and innovative spas brb getting funding for my in-home bubblewrap facials
147.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
You must not have finished reading. He originated the version that says "regular expressions", but not the "two problems" part or the sentiment about textmatching: >As cute as the “now you have two problems” quote is,
148.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
Luckily this particular practice is no longer legally sanctioned: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodriguez_v._United_States
149.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
Right? I thought I was still asleep when I opened the news to see a Sanders headline, until I read the story
150.
▲
by
gingerrr
11y ago
you think you are so smart and other people are so driven by their emotions I don't know about everyone but it sure as hell wont work on me
More ›