ghoshbishakh

7 ms·

31.
Roast your startup and send it to 1999(shipordie.club)
2 points by ghoshbishakh 7mo ago|0 comments
32.
Tell HN: AI coding is not for the impatient
2 points by ghoshbishakh 7mo ago|4 comments
33.
by ghoshbishakh 7mo ago
His paper on communicating processes was a great read when I was new to computer science research.
34.
by ghoshbishakh 8mo ago
We posted this warning on HN before: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40195410 We struggled a lot when we opted for the .online domain for https://pinggy.io urls
35.
by ghoshbishakh 9mo ago
Should you learn - yes. Do you really need it - probably not now, but eventually yes. I use it always to set up my dev environment so that the team can have a consistent environment to work on.
36.
by ghoshbishakh 9mo ago
As a candidate. The interviewer started with "This interview is not about what you don't know. It is all about what you know.". The interviewer was Kirit from a company called Endurance International Group.
37.
Ask HN: Is there any scope of building a non AI startup?
1 points by ghoshbishakh 9mo ago|1 comments
38.
Chunked Transfer Encoding – when content length is not known(pinggy.io)
2 points by ghoshbishakh 10mo ago|0 comments
39.
by ghoshbishakh 10mo ago
https://pinggy.io The core features of this tunneling tool are stable. I am working on adding support for TCP as well as UDP traffic through the same tunnel.
40.
by ghoshbishakh 11mo ago
Not a drop in replacement to ngrok. I think pinggy remains a better alternative of ngrok.
41.
by ghoshbishakh 11mo ago
For cf tunnel alternatives are available, I maintain pinggy.io
42.
by ghoshbishakh 11mo ago
For that kind of end-to-end encryption I use pinggy.io tls tunnels.
43.
by ghoshbishakh 11mo ago
Zero trust is a marketing term used by them - surprisingly it has nothing to do with end-to-end encryption also.
44.
by ghoshbishakh 11mo ago
I am working on Pinggy ( https://pinggy.io/ ) to make it the easiest tunneling tool. One feature we are working on is an attachable public IP. For those behind CGNAT, they can run this app and get a public IP instantly.
45.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
how is it so damn fast
46.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
Nice work testing free tiers against a pro subscription.
47.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
I salute your tenacity.
48.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
It is a tunnel, cant be used to browse a site through it isn't it?
49.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
Try pinggy.io for hosting once ;)
50.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
So do you suggest we should avoid setting a color in our CLI app? We would take this into consideration in our next pinggy.io CLI update.
51.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
rails has nothing to do with the rendered page size though. Congrats on the perfect lighthouse score.
52.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
It is correct that pangolin is something like pinggy.io or cf tunnels as you mention. But those do not give such fine grained access control it seems - like a firewall checking identity and all. But definitely it is not a vpn or mesh networ
53.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
So this is something like pinggy.io - self hosted?
54.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
There are tools specifically built for hosting stuff without public IP such as https://pinggy.io
55.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
The "Why not WebSocket?" arguments in the PR ar hilarious. Also, these arguments look AI generated which tells something.
56.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
Why route all traffic through a tunnel for a production setup? On-premise solutions will use static IPs from their ISPs. Full disclosure - I work at https://pinggy.io
57.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
So this is like a privater peer to peer version of https://pinggy.io ? Looks great. Although pinggy has option to whitelist ip or use an api key for authenticated access. This is somewhat similar to wireguard like setup - but ju
58.
by ghoshbishakh 1y ago
A one command tunneling tool to get public URLs to localhost. No installation required. https://pinggy.io
59.
by ghoshbishakh 2y ago
VDX.tv?
60.
by ghoshbishakh 2y ago
https://pinggy.io is a more affordable option than n grok.

More ›