gggtt

7 ms·

1.
by gggtt 6y ago
Dataflow, Pipelines, Signal Processing block diagrams, Functional programming, Flow-Based programming, Blender/Unreal Shader Graphs, The Grid in Bitwig, PureData/Max, VHDL, MATLAB Simulink, Node Red, Microservices, Tensorflow&#x2F
2.
by gggtt 6y ago
In most countries (eg Europe, US, Brazil, China, etc.) it's not the case and you have to give your ID (or some sort of identifier linked to your real identity) to get a SIM card or any internet service
3.
by gggtt 6y ago
Agreed. On the long-term, Apple is the one which might harm Privacy the most because they will kill the real Privacy alternatives by pretending they are one. People use Google & Facebook because they are dependent on their services but
4.
by gggtt 6y ago
But before anonymity was allowed, so all this toxicity & harassment didn't hurt too much because you could just create a new identity, start again, and it would go away. Today most people are on FB & social medias under their r
5.
by gggtt 6y ago
Totally agree. Maybe GPC could become that one day ? https://spreadprivacy.com/global-privacy-control-enabled-by-... It kind of seems like a second attempt to the do-not-track switch which was a failure. There must be str
6.
by gggtt 6y ago
ArmorPaint, and it has a beautiful UI
7.
by gggtt 6y ago
The same reason Firefox and Safari don't use Google V8 & Blink. They (mostly Safari) are the only opposition to Google monopolistic control on the web. You will always be under control of others if you don't take your independ
8.
by gggtt 6y ago
Because this era of "separate parts" comes to an end. Now everything is single SoC that are only compatible with big tech proprietary OS. Google has on purpose made Android different enough so that no Android SoC could run mainli
9.
by gggtt 6y ago
I am not convinced this is true. The reason Mozilla has not text-to-speech is because the guy behind RNNoise and LPCSpeech (JM Valin) has been bought by Amazon so that they can build even more privacy invasive Alexa & friends device. So
10.
by gggtt 6y ago
- and the boss paying herself massive salary while Mozilla is dying You can support Servo Project independently now : https://crowdfunding.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/projects/servo While it doesn't directly contribut
11.
by gggtt 6y ago
Maybe it's biased from my personal experience but I feel people overestimate the importance of the engine features for big games. When you do big games, you often write everything yourself My friend works at a studio who's doing a
12.
by gggtt 6y ago
Thank you. It's crazy nobody cares about this kind of practice. None of my friends would have noticed what you noticed. I guess social networks with "likes" were the first step and now actually rating your colleagues seems ac
13.
by gggtt 6y ago
It might be a stretch , but isn't it kind of the same idea as why ECS is faster than OO in video games development ?
14.
by gggtt 6y ago
That seems totally fair, thanks for your response. If the core is powerful thx to the choice of tech while plugins can be contributed easily then it sounds like a great plan !
15.
by gggtt 6y ago
Really cool. I think using standard JS or TS with a standard UI framework (like Vue, React, Svelte, etc.) would have attracted more contributors than Clojure. But otherwise , I'm really looking forward that project !
16.
by gggtt 6y ago
Yes exactly, it's always a big debate every time a new features is needed whereas it should be Wayland protocol or Dbus. Gnome people push for everything Dbus, and many Wayland dev prefer to standardize over Wayland protocol. It's
17.
by gggtt 6y ago
I have tried using wlroots, it's very hard. If you had to build your own compositor Mutter is far easier (it provides a GUI toolkit and all you need graphic wise). QTWayland is very nice too but won't get you far outside embedded
18.
by gggtt 6y ago
All major distros seem to have agreed on Flatpak/Freedesktop Portal dbus APIs. For eg, for screenshot : https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/portal-api-reference.html... There are still apps using legacy gnome&
19.
by gggtt 6y ago
Yes that's totally true. But first Google doesn't really portray themselves as a "Privacy respecting" alternative. And second, it's not because other companies are doing similar abusive things that we should praise
20.
by gggtt 6y ago
It's like someone beating you with a stick, and then they stop and you're like "Thank you for stopping beating me". It is crazy that a company that brags about privacy had a cross-app tracking system to start with
21.
by gggtt 6y ago
I'm not sure what you call "client-side encryption". As far as I know, ICloud is not end-to-end encrypted, so Apple can read anything on your ICloud if they want to.
22.
by gggtt 6y ago
My personal dream stack is having the best of Guix and Flatpak. Flatpak is sandboxed with clear APIs & portal which is absolutely necessary (even for FOSS app, for eg. if Firefox has a leak we'd be happy it can only access the down
23.
by gggtt 6y ago
No, decent app sandboxing would prevent that.
24.
by gggtt 6y ago
I don't think that Signal which is refusing forks or third party clients is any better aligned with the FOSS spirit.. https://github.com/LibreSignal/LibreSignal/issues/37#issueco... "You're fre
25.
by gggtt 6y ago
Telegram stores everything. You can send GBs videos and it will be stored and downloadable on any device from anywhere. It's like on a Dropbox or Drive. This costs a lot of money. On the other hand, I think Signal doesn't store an