Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ggggtez
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
23 ms
·
181.
▲
by
ggggtez
5y ago
I sincerely doubt it. How many people keep open 50+ tabs, or open a page and walk away? I'm sure that time spent on a page, if it's given any weight, is given barely any. I'm sure returns to search to click a new link is a mu
182.
▲
by
ggggtez
5y ago
I don't remember anyone ever saying that Google was promising strong AI? Just another case of wishful thinking by someone who doesn't like how the web works in practice?
183.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
> people know what you mean If someone tells me "hey wanna toot with me" I certainly don't think I'd have a clue what they meant.
184.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
Worse than that, there are rumors that he is relaunching a new company using the infamy he earned from crashing MoviePass into the ground. https://www.mediaplaynews.com/moviepass-founder-seeks-to-cre...
185.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
Agree. If anything, it made it seem like they don't really understand anything about MoviePass, or why it failed, or even what they were trying to do. It's like opening your example with saying you're going to talk about why
186.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
The article doesn't appear to know much about the real MoviePass story. In fact, the thing that the author suggests that they should have done was their actual business strategy: ramp up customer growth using other people's mone
187.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
> The way it is worded, it would sound to me, as a hiring manager, that you might not finish the work You read that correctly. The OP said clearly he has no intention to do documentation or testing, meetings, or much of anything other th
188.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
Others have said it but it bears repeating: Entitled No interviews? No fixed hours? Maximum 10 hours per week? He'll refuse to do anything he doesn't think is interesting? Who would even want to hire someone like this.
189.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
That guys take was garbage. Do you really believe that github is required to solve police facial recognition issues before they do anything else? Why is Github on the hook for that? They have nothing to do with it.
190.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
This is a very confusing post after you take into account that the author misunderstood that actually you can downvote comments.
191.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
> Not just another social network > it's just a forum with some convenience features Ok...
192.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
What the hell am I reading? Two people discussing whether to seriously tackle Zeno's Paradox or not? And their conclusion is... don't bother? Ok awesome. These two people can go about not bothering... and other people will try to
193.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
I believe that the "unreasonable restrictions" are that the user needs to click "I accept" when they enable sideloading and see a scary warning.
194.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
> There is no realistic alternative if you want to reach the 70% of the market Not to point out the obvious, but doesn't that mean that Google is providing a service that is providing you with value? I can't imagine someone say
195.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
If you go on Facebook and say "Hey, I'm going to go shoot up a school on twitch tomorrow", then Twitch can ban you. Previously, it was unclear that this was bannable because it didn't occur on site. Phrasing this as an a
196.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
This is not a conflation. Think it through: Google Play, YouTube, Google Music... these all perform advertising. And then look at the actual parent article that we're talking about. It's all about how YouTube Kids includes too man
197.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
If someone is a fiction writer, we shouldn't care what they have to say? Sure. Then let's agree his quote is worthless. But I'd still argue the opposite. This is a fiction writer who obviously is listened to. He's famo
198.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
The problem you have is that you created a Family Link account and thereby told google that your child was under 13. This is intended to meet legal liabilities, and the most egregious helicopter parents needs. And due to the Childs Online P
199.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
Yes, but I'm not sure it's the government's place to decide how much educational content is required for "kids" content. I agree that there should be some reasonable restrictions on advertising, but deciding what is
200.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
As far as I understand it, if PH stopped hosting the thumbnails, then Google would stop showing them. The problem is that PH didn't actually remove the thumbnails.
201.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
Are we going to offer a "bonus" to drivers that offer to drive old people, because they may take a little longer to get in the car? If the difference between profit and ruin is an extra 60 seconds for someone to sit down, then may
202.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
No. Because he opens his thought with saying that "Atheism" doesn't exist. Atheism isn't a rejection of "yearning" or "reverence". It's a rejection of religion. He's just playing word games,
203.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
The community has to choose where to spend money. So, they want a lifeguard because swimming makes life more enjoyable to live. That's fine. But saying something like "life is priceless" or worth millions or whatever, that&#x
204.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
That's silly. If we want to look at it in a purely utilitarian view, you could spend $8M per year and spend that on doctors and nurses, or EMT. Swimming is a calculated risk. While I appreciate what life guards do, that doesn't ne
205.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
If calling on the phone is not part of your social connection with other people (and obviously, here it wasn't) then I think it makes sense. Consider how most people communicate now a days. A call is only for long conversations . No o
206.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
> Some of them even stopped texting me because they had to open another app on their phone in order to write to me. Yeah, you also read that right. I guess they didn't live through the instant messenger wars. How did they not expect
207.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
Because the average person isn't running a server on their laptop? It makes no sense to think that multiple foreign nations are currently connected to random individual's computers, and actively fighting each other in your si
208.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
Yes, but probably not in your computer. I'm sure that there are daily attempts to breach into government networks around the world.
209.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
TL;DR - Guy starts out thinking he's smarter and wiser than his friends > "I see our current lives as better. Theirs appear to be a constant struggle most of the time." Magically his opinion about being a wage slave chang
210.
▲
by
ggggtez
6y ago
By that sort of reasoning, when a nation rolls tanks into your borders, you should just let them do it because more people would die if you fight back. If a nation actually did that (release a bioweapon and pre-immunize their own citizens).
More ›