ggg2

12 ms·

61.
by ggg2 7y ago
lol. every. single. generation. intel always promise a 35W (target that amd reached for a decade now) and always deliver around 50+...
62.
by ggg2 7y ago
is it lossless? what is the trade off?
63.
by ggg2 7y ago
Ireland and delaware are backdoors. they are not sustainable in the long run. I like to think of both as passing through an equalization phase. Though, I think Delaware is past it. Even if they had higher corp taxes than ny, they would stil
64.
by ggg2 7y ago
one thing just exacerbates the other. why do you think they should have had an alternative ready if they did fall (like us all) for google's empty promises of an open system? case in point f-droid: open source playStore alternative. go
65.
by ggg2 7y ago
it will go doubly up, for the drivers working when they say so. eventually it will starve the others. it's not like they need to actually be profitable at any point...
66.
by ggg2 7y ago
this thread show how teslas are the new mac in terms of blind fanboyish buyers remorse denial. people will defend the one button mouse just because. > study proving that the way information essential to driving (e.g. changing lanes, chec
67.
by ggg2 7y ago
nonsense. uber and lyft end-game is a monopoly. see how uber fixes the percentage it pays to drivers exclusively on their control of the market. if there's lyft in a city, they pass down 70%, if they are alone, they retain 70% instead.
68.
by ggg2 7y ago
7MBps sounds alrigth for anything consuming even a single source of video. it migth process that locally (lane departure, auto braking auto pilot, etc) and just upload the usage (e.g. how many times in the month you departed lane)
69.
by ggg2 7y ago
would be interesting to see how much of this is real need for a pickup. there's a marlon brandon(?) movie where he buys the biggest ram truck, just to drive up and down the street every day :) likewise, one could say that california ha
70.
by ggg2 7y ago
it's telling that the transportation market is late for disruption when you have to remind americans (or non-americans that live in the silicon valley culture, as most everyone here) that it is not just about cars...
71.
by ggg2 7y ago
they probably avoid it just to not risk having Musk sneaking into the board, or $deity forbid, as CEO. heck, that alone would be reason enough for me.
72.
by ggg2 7y ago
wake me up when the people cleaning the office's toilet bowls are also included in this PR announcement.
73.
by ggg2 7y ago
So, almost decade later we are fixing one bad case of small disinformation that people have to make a mental effort to even recall it? why?!?
74.
by ggg2 7y ago
"Anecdotally, I know multiple people who's tupperware parties count would..." I am not talking trash about your point. Just that you replied to a comment with not much understand of multi level marketing (pyramid schems) th
75.
by ggg2 7y ago
almost every single irc server since 94 or so have some sort of logger. if not, it's an intentional design choice for that one community.
76.
by ggg2 7y ago
mIRC was probably as easy as slack. but you didn't have to force everyone to use mIRC. Same for aim, icq... greedy killed all of those, not the ability to create better open clients. Namely msn and gtalk (not the jabber offering, which
77.
by ggg2 7y ago
great questions. how do you expect to have answers if even the reason for the main event, the hand over of Assange, is surrounded with disinformation ranging even from literal shit on the walls? we will never know what exactly happened on t
78.
by ggg2 7y ago
this is common among man too. a friend refused a exec position because he "would have to get cosmetic surgery often". now, the fact that she was featured in those "X under 30" lists should speaks lots about the journalis
79.
by ggg2 7y ago
and so does every email provider. heck one company even offers you a service to send this data (which they probably use for ad targeting already) to a 3rd party that automates back promotion claims with your credit card or something.
80.
by ggg2 7y ago
is this a silly PR attempt? nobody ever said this. what everybody said, and happened, was the other way around. And that's why google and everyone else encrypt even in-rack traffic.
81.
by ggg2 7y ago
what's the end game? do they sell 4G/LTE tech? Or do they want to harm china exports because they are enemies fighting for siberian oil? or is russia now doing things just for the fun of it?
82.
by ggg2 7y ago
for a foreigner, it shows how, if you can get the sympathy of the law enforcement grunts, you can get away with anything. investigator feels he have to pay too much tax while arresting people they deem unworthy of government benefits? go ah
83.
by ggg2 7y ago
if someone get enough passwords to DoS the service or force you to do a password reset, that's actually a pretty good safety fallback.
84.
by ggg2 7y ago
can't tell if you are joking or not. I highly suggest you read chrome's privacy policy on that password sync feature. Hint: when enabled on android the wifi password is unencrypted (or reversible, which is close to the same thing.
85.
by ggg2 7y ago
since the company has no profits and no prospect of making a profit (save from the wild claim that it is waiting for autonomous cars) what is the difference on sizing it on $1 or $50? both are overpriced in a pure analysis (i.e. ignoring ma
86.
by ggg2 7y ago
now you have the problem of making your crap accessibility hardware closed source firmware to send the caps lock key code instead of ctrl. Good luck with that.