gf000

23 ms·

571.
by gf000 8mo ago
That assumes that hardware was/is/will be more expensive than.. simply scaling up data collection and training? Which seems like a very bad assumption, I'm not even sure it was ever true and is getting less and less true.
572.
by gf000 8mo ago
You rely on a moving camera, microphones and vibrations all together. Driven by a supposedly more advanced meatware than what tech can create today, so that it can properly reason even with faulty/missing signals.
573.
by gf000 8mo ago
It's not like Apple would frown about the idea of an action having "no intuitive visual associated with it". On iOS, you can scroll to the top by pressing on the status bar as one example.
574.
by gf000 8mo ago
Well, we "clearly" haven't crossed that point, but no one knows where that point is.
575.
by gf000 8mo ago
But depending on the discussion, 'it' is not materially the same as the previous instance. There was another response made with a now extended context. But that other response could have been done by another agent, another model,
576.
by gf000 8mo ago
Reality is. Consciousness is.. questionable. I have one. You? I don't know, I'm experiencing reality and you seem to have one, but I can never know it. Computations on the other hand describe reality. And unless human brains som
577.
by gf000 8mo ago
Who says it is a subset of computer science? But computational models are possibly the most universal thing there is, they are beneath even mathematics, and physical matter is no exception. There is simply no stronger computational model th
578.
by gf000 8mo ago
To the best of our knowledge, we live in a physical reality with matter that abides by certain laws. So personal beliefs aside, it's a safe starting assumption that human brains also operate with these primitives. A Turing machine is a
579.
by gf000 9mo ago
But waiting on multiple sockets for each app is surely more expensive than a single one, isn't it?
580.
by gf000 9mo ago
Grep and vim are a much smaller magnitude than Linux, so don't mix the two. And you do pay for Linux indirectly, it ain't written by some developer in their basements out of their good heart for a long time. It's written by I
581.
by gf000 9mo ago
So it either drains battery and gets significant delays (as per ntfy's own docs), or it still uses Google's solution. There is no free lunch.
582.
by gf000 9mo ago
Turing machines have a well-defined input, and output if they halt. So no, they are absolutely not useless, they are just "single-shot" models of computation. Certain software fit that model very nicely (e.g. compilers), others le
583.
by gf000 9mo ago
> but it’s not obviously simpler or safer On top of likely having worse performance.
584.
by gf000 9mo ago
Native functions that are no longer sandboxed, defeating the whole purpose.
585.
by gf000 9mo ago
It's absolutely trivial to make a very strict sandbox - just a simple, mathematical Turing machine is 100% safe. The hard part is having actual capabilities, and only WASI (which is much smaller than WASM) helps here, and it's not
586.
by gf000 9mo ago
Is such an emulator not part of their training data sets?
587.
by gf000 9mo ago
If it's exponential growth. It may just as well be some slow growth and continue to be so.
588.
by gf000 9mo ago
I have been thinking of something similar for quite some time. Though my idea was more like making comments "first class citizens", and in certain formats they can link to each other/external documents, tracking inconsistent
589.
by gf000 9mo ago
It sucks for interactive use only. It could be solved in user space (see the other comment with cgroups), it just isn't.
590.
by gf000 9mo ago
Where a random malicious president can't just hijack the government and giga-companies can't trivially lobby lawmakers for profits at the expense of citizens?
591.
by gf000 9mo ago
> it is SpaceX/Elon The known scammer guy? Like these ideas wouldn't pass the questions at the end of a primary school presentation.
592.
by gf000 9mo ago
Hate speech laws exist in most of Europe and they are not abused at all. And it's not like media wouldn't already have a bunch of laws applied to it, even in the US - e.g. libel and the like. Surely you can slippery slope with tha
593.
by gf000 9mo ago
So you think writing a review is somehow on the same magnitude as social media platforms with 300 million-3 billion users? And how is that different from TV channels/media en large having laws to abide by? Slippery slope arguments are
594.
by gf000 9mo ago
> As we're seeing with the current US President Well, that's particular to the US. It just shows that checks and balances are not properly implemented there, just previous presidents weren't exploiting it maliciously for t
595.
by gf000 9mo ago
I mean, that's surely not as simple as you make it out to be.
596.
by gf000 9mo ago
What about cgroups? I know they are not exactly analogous, but to me that seems like a pretty decent solution.
597.
by gf000 9mo ago
You mean physical reality
598.
by gf000 9mo ago
Musk's whole mission is to scam even more people. Unfortunately people still buy his bullshit even though he couldn't deliver on anything, and just converts one failure to hyping up his next idiotic product. (Yes, I know what stee
599.
by gf000 9mo ago
I don't know, LLMs strive on human text, so I would wager that a language designed for humans would quite closely match an ideal one for LLMs. Probably the only difference is that LLMs are not "lazy", they better tolerate boi
600.
by gf000 9mo ago
/mnt/shared is mounted to see your downloads and the like, so you can manipulate them just fine.

More ›