gf000

18 ms·

331.
by gf000 6mo ago
Perhaps java's related JEPs could be a good starting point? https://openjdk.org/jeps/505 There are also related discussions on other platforms that are worthy to read.
332.
by gf000 6mo ago
I don't think comparing 97's green threads to virtual threads ever made sense. Like their purpose/implementation everything is just so different, they don't share anything at all.
333.
by gf000 6mo ago
> Modern terminal software supports displaying images, for what it's worth. In a worse, and dramatically overcomplicated way. Like it's kind of funny that largely the same people that is all for this supposed ultra minimalism w
334.
by gf000 6mo ago
Come on, my previous phone had more bandwidth via a goddamn satellite, sending emergency infos.
335.
by gf000 6mo ago
> Constraint breeds consistency and consistency breeds coherence. In principle I would agree, but there are plenty of bad citizens among TUIs, it's absolutely not true that you can just start using one. The same way there are excell
336.
by gf000 6mo ago
Blender? There you have to use a mouse because you have a much much bigger state space to control. Also, Intellij is perhaps a better example. You can fully control it via only the keyboard, yet no amount of plugins would turn (neo)vim in
337.
by gf000 6mo ago
Is that always beneficial? Do you ever want to select the text of a confirm button? What if it just popped on top in a dialog to the content you were about to select?
338.
by gf000 6mo ago
What about a map, or an image? We can surely agree that humans can take in a lot more information than a readable letter-grid allows, depending on the type of information.
339.
by gf000 6mo ago
But why? You easily have 4k pixels, why use a tiny subset of those in a very inefficient way? We have proper hardware to make a bunch of these computations actually fast, and yet we should stuck with drawing relatively expensive text everyw
340.
by gf000 6mo ago
But I might want some cool original project with a boring but working web UI, so that other people can actually try out what I have created.
341.
by gf000 6mo ago
In what way is it worse? The range of values they can contain is well-specified. And you have a frame with an operands stack where you should be able to store at least a 32-bit value. `double` would just fill 2 adjacent slots. And reference
342.
by gf000 6mo ago
Doesn't really change the picture. If you don't know the basics of a car, then you absolutely shouldn't be driving in traffic either.
343.
by gf000 6mo ago
This is not what the laws is about, though: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47835530 It's replaceable without special tools, heating, solvents. It can easily feature a screw or a million other solutions.
344.
by gf000 6mo ago
The free market only works when you have sufficient competition. The phone market is absolutely not trivial to enter, so your first sentence is plain and simply false. Also, given that iphones almost already pass the requirements, where is
345.
by gf000 6mo ago
Well, this just incentivized a new battery tech then, what's the problem?
346.
by gf000 6mo ago
Well, Apple was already fined for decreasing the CPU frequency (to avoid spikes on aged batteries), so that's not really an option. (Even though at the time they wasn't doing it out of malice at all, they actually tried to keep ol
347.
by gf000 6mo ago
It's replaceable with commercially available tools , it doesn't mean that you should be able to pop off the battery during the day at any point. This doesn't restrict the design space that much at all.
348.
by gf000 6mo ago
> user replacement battery It's not really the old kind of replace-ability, though. The only requirement is that you should be able to change it with commercially available tools.
349.
by gf000 6mo ago
Phones back then were definitely not as durable as modern ones. Whether you like it or not, it's easier to waterproof a completely insulated system.
350.
by gf000 6mo ago
> Was switching everyone to USB-C annoying for Apple? Sure. Doubt. They have already switched over every other line they had. I believe it was more of a marketing stunt, they calculated that n% of customers will be upset with the change,
351.
by gf000 6mo ago
I would assume that another factor is that the technique for a given exercise on the other hand can be improved, and that can help with decreasing the necessary energy - would that be a correct statement? And as a follow up, depending on ac
352.
by gf000 6mo ago
I think it's a pretty recent thing. Turing completeness is neither a sufficient nor a required property. HTML is not a programming language, it's a markup language - it's in the name, and it's the way it is used (it&#x27
353.
by gf000 6mo ago
Regular expressions are probably not enough for parsing formulas (depending of course on the exact task given), they usually are at least a context free language.
354.
by gf000 6mo ago
There has never been a requirement for a "true" programming language to be Turing complete. Also, basically every such language has escape hatches similar to unsafe in Rust to allow expressions that are not provably terminating. T
355.
by gf000 6mo ago
The text is barely legible, and you can hardly ever click on the actual target you want (e.g. upvote vs downvote). It's timeless in that it was never good to begin with, it is just actively malicious now for anyone using it from a touc
356.
by gf000 6mo ago
And humans are incredibly bad at "skimming through this long text to check for errors", so this is not a happy pairing. As for the homework, there is obviously a huge category that is pointless. But it should not be that way, and
357.
by gf000 6mo ago
Absolutely not my area of expertise but giving it a few examples of what should be the expected answer in a fine-tuning step seems like a reasonable thing and I would expect it would "fix" it as in less likely to fall into the tra
358.
by gf000 6mo ago
If the app is not running, then `cp sqlite.db sqlite.db.BK`
359.
by gf000 6mo ago
Probably the best use case would be something like a Facebook profile page for a given user. It may not have a very rigid schema, you may later add several other optional fields. You need very large scale (as in no of concurrent accesses),
360.
by gf000 6mo ago
The recommended advice is to start with semantics first. Syntax will change, there is not much point fixing it down too early. Most of the work is actually the backend, and people sort of illusion themselves into "creating a language

More ›