2 ms·
> Modern terminal software supports displaying images, for what it's worth. In a worse, and dramatically overcomplicated way. Like it's kind of funny that larg
by gf000 6mo ago
> Modern terminal software supports displaying images, for what it's worth.
In a worse, and dramatically overcomplicated way. Like it's kind of funny that largely the same people that is all for this supposed ultra minimalism would be celebrating a Rube Goldberg way of doing graphical interfaces? (Because in the end it is a graphical interface).
- pwinnski 6mo agoSorry for the late response; it's been a busy week. As a user, I don't care how complicated is the means of displaying images in a terminal session. I would only want to do so when I'm deep in a text-oriented context and there is a suddenly a need for an image. Not a chart or a graph, but an actual image. As a user, whatever contortions are necessary at that point are fine, because it's an unusual circumstance. I hope that makes sense.