gethesmane

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by gethesmane 9y ago

   It sounds like you see no problem with selectively manipulating the English language to drum up support for legal outcomes "absolutely want" to happen, then.
2. 2.▲
   by gethesmane 9y ago

   Seems pretty journalistic to me. You might want to think about what the basic definition of "journalism" is, then. And how maintaining a relentlessly detailed, universally accessible dossier on the 1 percent of the population t
3. 3.▲
   by gethesmane 9y ago

   That does not seem to be a truism on the face of it. Agreed. It's actually quite empty, on the face of it.
4. 4.▲
   by gethesmane 9y ago

   (1) This is probably a project by a small "research" group at Facebook. With blessings from on high, no doubt. (2) According to the article, the project was never actually started. Oh yes it was -- the FB spokesperson said it
5. 5.▲
   by gethesmane 9y ago

   The problem with this thinking is that Google is not in the "business of war" but in the business of artificial intelligence. Sorry, but this just spin. If you create product X specifically designed for and marketed to vertic
6. 6.▲
   by gethesmane 9y ago

   "Victim's family agrees to gag order in fatal self-driving vehicle accident" would have been a better title. The terms of the settlement were not given. The law firm representing Herzberg’s daughter and husband, whose names