germandiago

7 ms·

91.
by germandiago 2mo ago
My recommendation is that you ask for equity, even if a small amount. Justify it based on the risk of the labor market and your work done.
92.
by germandiago 2mo ago
Thanks for this idea. Seems reasonable. I think this should be combined with banning people who cheat by trying to explain code without properly reviewing it and burning cycles from humans at the other side. At least that would be my policy
93.
by germandiago 2mo ago
It is reasonable to stop some people from flooding projects wirh low quality PRs that take time on the other side, that might not work at all or be patches that are several times the size of what is needed and get a lot in the way of the ma
94.
by germandiago 2mo ago
True, as I read back it seems it was sarcasm...very short sighted on my side...
95.
by germandiago 2mo ago
I think historic records of production have a lot of wisdom. For whoever it is interested.
96.
by germandiago 2mo ago
I see, so you are suggesting making black markets appear. Good, I see you studied economic history a lot... There is no way around this, believe me. Not sure why you call pigs to people producing actually. That is how things end up working.
97.
by germandiago 2mo ago
You do not get equity from your comoany?
98.
by germandiago 2mo ago
European here. I left Europe 14 years ago. I tried to come back. My decision was to run away bc it is impossible to build a reasonable life in a stable way where you do not get smashed mercilessly... It is just too much.
99.
by germandiago 2mo ago
Yes, remove the human incentive to produce, which is that the rest can consume in a way that is profitable enough for the producer and you will see the wxcess disappear in front of your eyes for killing the incentive to produce. Infinitely
100.
by germandiago 2mo ago
Oh, and you think everyone will continue prpducing all the things you need for you to use them forever withiut contributing anything back to anyone? Then get ready to be a slave, bc noone, absolutely noone gives things for free, which is, i
101.
by germandiago 2mo ago
What you are saying here, and I am not a protestant, is that some people will work for you while you do what you feel like. That mindset, taken to the extreme, hides a kind of sibylline slavery, Idk if you get why. It also makes for far les
102.
by germandiago 2mo ago
Well, I am not sure what you mean exactly. But it enables incremental addition of errors and you can decide later what to do exactly, so I still tend to see it as an advantage. It is like defer the error handling and centralize later. If yo
103.
by germandiago 2mo ago
Or you can assume exceptions can be thrown and capture and log coming from a base class in a centralized place (and probably refine incrementally what to do with each group without dirtying all the logic inside the functions themselves). Fo
104.
by germandiago 2mo ago
> D's scope exit/failure/success is built on top of RAII and has nothing to do with the GC. What I meant here (I do not know the mechanism) is that I am aware that D has a GC. This means, correct me if I am wrong, that D d
105.
by germandiago 2mo ago
I think there is nothing better than exceptions + RAII for error handling since exceptions cannot be ignored by accident. I would classify D's scope exit/failure/success as RAII actually, even if D uses a GC. Sometimes you mi
106.
by germandiago 2mo ago
Please I am all ears. I have right now a landing page and a NiceGUI dashboard with websockets (but only need SSE, though I need charts). I am all the time looking at htmx and used to "desktop-like" workflows for UI authoring. So I
107.
by germandiago 2mo ago
I think it is a very good point: "because the "accidentals" become tied up with things like nepotism, unfair and arbitrary" I never thought of this from this perspective but indeed it seems to be totally true.
108.
by germandiago 2mo ago
> some PRs were written by Anthropic employees Oh, that company that I heard did not use humans aymore to write software and bragged about it? I heard, correct me if I am wrong. Something does not match here...
109.
by germandiago 2mo ago
For me this is how all workflows with AI end up lookingif you really want robust products. Do whatever with AI, go fast (from the point of view of perception, initially) BUT it is not going to work without extra work. and ho, the bloat, do
110.
by germandiago 3mo ago
I think this is common sense. You have what you have, not an alternative universe.
111.
by germandiago 3mo ago
How so? Final validation always goes in the server side.
112.
by germandiago 3mo ago
I still reach for C++ on the backend. Honestly, with all its warts, I like it overall. You can write pretty fast and reasonable code nowadays.
113.
by germandiago 3mo ago
Samsung has been banned from my choices. There are many brands to choose from.
114.
by germandiago 3mo ago
I commented not so long ago to people very invested in AI, agents and tokens that are very enthusiast that I would not use an agent for security reasons and loss of control (besides suboptimal output). It seems I was not wrong. Not that I d
115.
by germandiago 3mo ago
> Most people don’t reason their way to conclusions and then feel accordingly. They feel first, then reason backward to justify the feeling. That is how sales work, if someone is ever interested in increasing sales and one of the pieces
116.
by germandiago 3mo ago
Bye bye then. I love physical collection. If I buy it, it is my copy, not my provider's copy for rent.
117.
by germandiago 3mo ago
I never thought of it this way... who knows, could be a possibility! Oh, this is creepy...
118.
by germandiago 3mo ago
That is closer to consciousness than AI will ever be. :)
119.
by germandiago 4mo ago
From the comments I hear and depending on people I met from sifferent countries, I would say that yes.
120.
by germandiago 4mo ago
You cannot blame like this the administration when you make any regulatory mistake such as not knowing a rule or not being able to enforce it in practice. It is amazing that we have regulations for everything and that when they cannot enfor

More ›