gerggerg

19 ms·

151.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Considering we won't see this changed since the author has already closed the issue and expressed his satisfaction with the current rules this article should at least serve as a reminder for errors not to repeat with the next language some
152.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Dear citizens. It's no longer OK to not participate in democracy. And I don't just mean vote. I mean spread information and encourage others to vote. In essence; Lobby. Everyone who fancies themselves someone who cares about legislation sh
153.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Hmmm, makes sense. Pokemon names are roughly representative of some of their characteristics and are designed so that even children can remember all of them. Now if only we could name historical events and pieces of legislation like we name
154.
by gerggerg 15y ago
When talking about compiling computer languages. It would help if we were all using the standard definition of a compiler. I'm glad you've got your own definition but using it only serves to confuse the discussion. Furthermore, your argumen
155.
by gerggerg 15y ago
From the coffeescript website: CoffeeScript is a little language that compiles into JavaScript. Underneath all those awkward braces and semicolons, JavaScript has always had a gorgeous object model at its heart. CoffeeScript is an attempt
156.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Culture: No one ones it. Not even creators. Copyright: An incentive to produce culture. The Internet: A bit distribution platform. Technology: Gave you the ability to sell physical records, then took it away. That was a quick century.
157.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Could you comment on a good use-case for this? A time when it would actually be better to construct a switch block dynamically vs all at once.
158.
by gerggerg 15y ago
in coffeescript: fib = (n) -> switch n when 0 then 0 when 1 then 1 else fib(n-1) + fib(n-2) alert fib 20
159.
by gerggerg 15y ago
While I am super excited for the future of auto-driving auto-motives, does this patent really prove anything novel and non obvious? QR codes are already used for orientation by many systems, and it seems quite obvious that an autonomous car
160.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Couldn't the TV show inspector gadget be considered prior art?
161.
by gerggerg 15y ago
it has been developed behind closed doors for over 2 years why behind closed doors? is there any effort to make this an open standard?
162.
by gerggerg 15y ago
clickable: http://gigaom.com/cloud/facebook-shares-some-secrets-on-maki...
163.
by gerggerg 15y ago
I can probably be considered part of that vocal minority. Could you comment on what about this thread is so depressing to you?
164.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Why is it considered a thoughtful argument that he is at least not committing worse criminal acts?
165.
by gerggerg 15y ago
How can I possibly comment on it if I can't get any factual information? Are you saying witches don't exist? We've all seen them and you look like one.
166.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Did they not come up with a new and interesting way to do search? I think you're massively confused about the beginnings of google.
167.
by gerggerg 15y ago
And that is why it's tolerated to a certain threshold. Thankfully (for us and him) we're still below the threshold. But if more people start selling candy on the subway you can bet you'd be happy they did something about it. And this dude w
168.
by gerggerg 15y ago
"rooting for the person that goes for it" is an example prime of a subjective statement. Do you not think that patent trolls perceive themselves as "going for it"?
169.
by gerggerg 15y ago
plus it'll cut down on that pesky paper trail of communication if engaging in illegal acts.
170.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Ironically, if google rescinds that offer, you'll always have selling candy in the subway to fall back on.
171.
by gerggerg 15y ago
With no link we can't really enter it into the discussion. Food trucks are licensed and subject to food quality regulations.
172.
by gerggerg 15y ago
See my further comment in this discussion made about this topic. TLDR: shouldn't have redefined entrepreneur.
173.
by gerggerg 15y ago
And good point with the comment on me trying to redefine entrepreneur. What I should have said is i don't think he's an interesting entrepreneur.
174.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Untapped? Selling candy to nice people in an uncomfortable situation is an untapped market?
175.
by gerggerg 15y ago
I can't seem to find any information on the GrubWithUs flyers. Could you post a link? Lemonade stands don't stand to gain immense competition because of relaxing regulation.
176.
by gerggerg 15y ago
I don't think it's bad to break the rules in either case. He's just not an entrepreneur, and this article proposes nothing truly interesting. He's selling shit on the subway. He didn't come up with a new and interesting way to sell shit. He
177.
by gerggerg 15y ago
And if it were actually legal, there would be more; many more. If it gets past a certain tolerance you can bet Bloomberg will fire up the ticket machine.
178.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Selling shit on the subway is illegal. The reason this man is capable of making a profit is because he has almost no competition. It has nothing to do with entrepreneurship, being a good salesman, having a good idea, or really anything posi
179.
by gerggerg 15y ago
Awesome thanks!
180.
by gerggerg 15y ago
The link states "Several things don't work as of yet." Anyone know what those might be?

More ›