geepound

5 ms·

1.
by geepound 4y ago
>This is true of basically all literary journalism. How do so many interesting things happen to these people that they can write about it? Easy, they make it up. It is not all made up. >“There is just a very shallow truth in facts,”
2.
by geepound 4y ago
>Seems it was not from the shelling. We think you're missing the larger point
3.
Whataboutism(en.wikipedia.org)
2 points by geepound 4y ago|1 comments
4.
by geepound 4y ago
>things are still running running from the radiation released from the shelling of nuke plants, not running in the "performing normally" sense "Radiation levels increased about 20-fold on Thursday" https://
5.
by geepound 4y ago
They knew enough to shoot a part that is filled with fluid and hard to replace. They might have lacked the knowledge of "the grid" to make such an attack go beyond one county, but there was some degree of thought put into that att
6.
by geepound 4y ago
>"Here, fill it out again and don't mention that." >I had the exact same experience when applying for a clearance while I was in college Speaking as someone on the autistic spectrum, this is why the entire clearance pro
7.
by geepound 4y ago
I'd avoid them at all costs. There is one in my hometown. (Software Engineering Institute) It's employees love to stroll off onto online dating sites and list of things like drug use, foreign ties, or... other things that would pr
8.
by geepound 4y ago
But have they relaxed their policy on Comic Sans[1] since Condoleezza Rice's tenure? ;-) https://achewood.com/index.php?date=07052007
9.
by geepound 4y ago
>If becomes widely known that the government can de-cloak Tor users, that will change the behaviour of their targets and so hurt their surveillance, so it's fairly common that the government wants to hide this fact. (same with sting