geaserg34234

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by geaserg34234 10y ago

   Understandable. Comment quality does tend to be pretty low for throw-away accounts. Unfortunately I don't maintain a regular account and (perhaps naively) hope that the quality of any comment I make will speak for itself and not be bol
2. 2.▲
   by geaserg34234 10y ago

   I don't agree. I see it as evidence that the NRA has fought against the CDC conducting policy advocacy. The CDC was advocating gun-control, so people got upset and cut their funding. Then a law was put on the books saying they weren&#x
3. 3.▲
   by geaserg34234 10y ago

   That funding cut of $2.6M was restored afterwards.
4. 4.▲
   by geaserg34234 10y ago

   I haven't seen any evidence that the NRA has fought research. They have taken a stand against the CDC advocating for gun-control policies, not performing gun-violence research. The CDC has simply refused to do this research since being