Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
gd1
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
211.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
"On the other hand, all the leagues have significantly lower average hotness in the first half compared to the second half, so maybe it’s not just the NBA that has a boring first half problem." This seems to be a misconception. It
212.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
100% of priests agree there is a god.
213.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Lets be clear: not everyone is convinced that putting carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is even a problem.
214.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
That's like asking a marathon runner why he doesn't just hop in a car. I use many languages. I use C# to knock out a GUI. VBA for a bit of spreadsheet work. Q/KDB+ for database/functional work. R for stats. All of t
215.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
>reference counted system is a _garbage_collector_ Exactly. An awful one.
216.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
How did we ever survive without them, before boost showed up? I seem to remember doing just fine. They are a symbol of the useless bloating of C++, a language trying to be all things to all people. A half-assed halfway house between mana
217.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
They have no real reason to exist. At best, they are syntactic sugar (auto_ptr), at worst they actually encourage poor design (shared_ptr). They are basically a crutch for programmers who grew up with managed languages and are afraid of r
218.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
There are some very good answers to that question. Related to that question, I still fail to see any advantage to using shared_ptr, weak_ptr, unique_ptr, auto_ptr, etc. If you are doing C++ right, nearly everything should be allocated on
219.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
She does work. She has three children to raise.
220.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Let Jon Stewart answer you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSbkFpAA4CA
221.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
VAT is paid on the difference between what you obtained a good/service for and what you sold it on at. The clue is in the name - "value added". You can even get a refund if you make a loss. A transaction tax would be charge
222.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Important things are 24 hours a day. Spot and forward FX, commodities, sovereign bond futures, Equity index futures, etc. See for example: http://www.cmegroup.com/trading_hours/ CME tends to be closed for an hour a
223.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
They brought about a great scientific improvement. At NIWA's site you can now see detailed accounting of the methodology behind the adjustments: http://www.niwa.co.nz/our-science/climate/information-and-re...
224.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Your link wasn't there when I posted was it?
225.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Through skepticism. What you're doing there is faith.
226.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Bodek is a failed trader, and one who apparently can't read exchange API manuals (here's BATS explaining it for him: https://www.batstrading.com/resources/features/bats_exchange... ). Now he's trying
227.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
True enough, I was discussing direct market access. If you're going through a third party, it's up to you to vet them and make sure they are trustworthy. I agree almost word-for-word with Optiver's submission on payment for
228.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
You're still not getting it. You send your messages on a private link to the exchange. Then the exchange processes them (either puts an order in the order book) or matches a trade, and only then publishes that this has happened on the
229.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Fine, I'll attempt to parse through your example. "Rather than buying Wigets-R-Us at $100/share, the HFT slips in with a, say, $99.99 offer to the seller, and offers you $100.01." So, 2 possibilities, you don't say,
230.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
You have no actual idea how a limit order book works do you?
231.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Google and read up about "adverse selection". You are wrong, a retail investor/trader should never (ever) place a limit order. You have negative expectation on those orders, since you are (on the whole), slower and more naiv
232.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
It reads slightly different in context, but then you probably know that: "There is no such thing as society. There is a living tapestry of men and women and people and the beauty of that tapestry and the quality of our lives will depen
233.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
>very difficult to believe that something this sophisticated was developed by anyone other than a well financed, possibly nation-state backed organisation. Hilarious. A "well financed, nation-state backed organisation" just ga
234.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Liquidity isn't a function of time, it is a function of relative time between the predators (arbitrageurs) and the prey (market makers). If the predators are much faster than the prey, liquidity will disappear since the market makers
235.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
And you've merely tried to change the subject. Something can't be front-running if it happens after a publicly disseminated market event. Understood? Flash orders = front running. Trading ahead of client flow = front running.
236.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
By the way, this is an awful, awful idea that you hear quite a lot. Think about what would happen. What incentive would a participant have for placing an order early in the one minute interval? If you can't cancel it, you're a si
237.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Dark pools exist because these "real investors" you speak of are muppets. If you're a market maker out in the big bad world you are exposed to adverse selection risk - i.e. you're up against smarter, better informed or
238.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Wtf? An example of latency arbitrage is say, two identical fungible securities listed on different exchanges. An order arrives causing the price on one exchange (A) to spike up (the event), you react after that event and buy the securit
239.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
You'd best look up the definition of "front-running". Reacting to an event the fastest makes you the quickest behind-runner, but you're still behind. Not front-running at all. Where did you even learn this term? Are y
240.
▲
by
gd1
13y ago
Why? What's the response time on an airbag release in an accident? On the ABS in your car? Your graphics card manages to rotate, scale, texture and shade a hundred million polygons per frame in around 1000/60 = 16ms. We'r
More ›