2 ms·
They brought about a great scientific improvement. At NIWA's site you can now see detailed accounting of the methodology behind the adjustments: http://www.ni
by gd1 13y ago
They brought about a great scientific improvement. At NIWA's site you can now see detailed accounting of the methodology behind the adjustments:
http://www.niwa.co.nz/our-science/climate/information-and-resources/nz-temp-record/seven-station-series-temperature-data/adjustments http://www.niwa.co.nz/our-science/climate/information-and-re...
That was put together in December 2010. Before that, they'd been handled in an ad-hoc manner. Some of the adjustments detailed in the literature, some no doubt scrawled on a piece of paper on some professor's desk or sitting in some fortran code on a 5 1/2 floppy. The thing about climate science is that it is done by academics, and if you've ever been in academia you'll know what I mean... If they want us to turn the modern economy inside-out, it is fair enough to ask for a little more rigour.
- acqq 13y agoAs far as I understand, the deniers didn't do it. They just trolled enough to force the additional analysis by the real scientists. The result? "NIWA's 'seven-station' series has been re-analysed, and independently peer-reviewed, and the result confirms a NZ-wide warming trend." Practically the same result, nothing that confirms the wishes of deniers.