gck1

11 ms·

211.
by gck1 7mo ago
The remaining 93% exist mostly because these 7% were loud. Users who aren't using their quota will gradually disappear when that 7% starts being loud in the other direction.
212.
by gck1 7mo ago
Not sure what the plan is here to be honest. First, this has been going on for a week now and Anthropic support was gaslighting people, saying nothing has changed. Well, obviously it has, they said it now. Additionally, Anthropic saying wee
213.
Update on Session Limits – /U/ClaudeOfficial(old.reddit.com)
5 points by gck1 7mo ago|0 comments
214.
by gck1 7mo ago
Anthropic tried to fix this I think. Because it's the only model that will push back, but it's even funnier. Ask a question, it will say yes, ask "are you sure?", it will reverse direction full throttle, then ask are you
215.
by gck1 7mo ago
Yup. I do have a 4-step process for this (just for prompts and some bash scripts that call CC). 1. Breadth first 2. Compress 3. Per player deep research 4. Per player compression. Then I just merge all the markdown files, fit it into 250k t
216.
by gck1 7mo ago
There's no chance they're able to subsidize this much. You can burn $600 of API equivalent in a day without affecting your weekly quota that much. What's likely is that light users are paying for heavy users and API pricing i
217.
by gck1 7mo ago
There's nothing consistent with Anthropic on this matter. Their documentation, cli, SDKs, TOS, their public stance - have major contradictions and are subject to so much interpretation that you can't really figure out what's
218.
by gck1 7mo ago
Anthropic itself advertised their own implementation of agentic loop (Ralph plugin). Sure, it worked via their official plugin, but the end result for Anthropic would be the same. There's nothing in TOS that prevents you from running a
219.
by gck1 7mo ago
And please, find an alternative to discord for your community. It baffles me that everyone has collectively decided it's a great idea to have discussions on a platform which is not indexable, and has no usable search even when you&#x27
220.
by gck1 7mo ago
SQL - somewhat, python - no. LLMs that write code only work well with proper guardrails. Dynamic languages like Python lack essential guardrails. Once the project can't fit in model's usable context window (~150k tokens even for 1
221.
by gck1 7mo ago
It seems like everyone has a very different idea of what spec means in agentic coding. To me, spec answers the what, the plan answers the how, and in what order, build packets answer the how but with more granularity. In most cases, you sho
222.
by gck1 7mo ago
ccusage on my $200 subscription shows that I'd spend ~$600 per day if I used PAYGO model.
223.
by gck1 8mo ago
Not sure how accurate this is, but found contextarena benchmarks today when I had the same question. It appears only gemini has actual context == effective context from these. Although, I wasn't able to test this neither in gemini cli,
224.
by gck1 8mo ago
Claude is Anthropic's property which they rent to the government. Is there any other place where rental agreements don't come with clauses on how the property can and can't be used?
225.
by gck1 8mo ago
Enforce this with deterministic guardrails. Use strictest linting config you possibly can, and even have it write custom, domain specific linters of things that can't happen. Then you won't have to hand hold it that much
226.
by gck1 8mo ago
Yeah, people seem to forget one of the L's in LLM stands for Language, and human language is likely the largest chunk in training data. A cli that is well designed for humans is well designed for agents too. The only difference is that
227.
by gck1 8mo ago
Yeah, that one can't even figure out how to write a formula, or sometimes read data when it's sitting WITHIN context of sheets. I get better experience if I just copy-paste the sheet data into Gemini web. And IIRC copy-paste is ju
228.
by gck1 8mo ago
Not because it's fast, but because of its compiler. It acts as a very good guardrail and feedback mechanism for LLMs.
229.
by gck1 8mo ago
Isn't that NVME also very expensive to replace because it's tied to hardware identifiers? If you keep swapping all the time, surely NVME would be the first part to fail
230.
by gck1 8mo ago
This is only true for fully unsupervised "vibe coding". But you'll find this will not work for anything beyond a basic todo list app. You'll free up your time from actually writing code, but on the other hand, you'
231.
by gck1 8mo ago
> Meanwhile, my last interview already did test my AI skills. Curious to hear more about this.
232.
by gck1 8mo ago
> But you are forgetting your skills (seen it first hand), and you're not learning anything new. This is just false. I may forget how to write code by hand, but I'm playing with things I never imagined I would have time and abi
233.
by gck1 8mo ago
If you want an answer to the OP question, just ask AI to analyze the session jsonl files in your user directory and give you statistics of what's in there. You'll find that at least half of it is noise. If you put that in commits,
234.
by gck1 8mo ago
Yes on both counts. Implementation plan is a second layer after the spec is written, at which point, spec can't be changed by agents. I then launch a planner agent that writes a phased plan file and each builder can only work on a sin
235.
by gck1 8mo ago
More like 2x$200 plans.
236.
by gck1 8mo ago
No. I run a similar setup and with $200 subscription, I usually hit weekly quota by around day 3-4. My approach is 4-5 hours of extreme human in the loop spec sessions with opus and codex: 1. We discuss every question with opus, and we ask
237.
Got suspended while using headless mode with custom system prompt(github.com)
3 points by gck1 8mo ago|0 comments
238.
by gck1 8mo ago
You could also use the same framework always - that's what I'm doing anyway. But you gotta remember that no matter how well you spec it, first iteration of the specs is going to suck anyway. But you vibe-code it anyway and see wha
239.
by gck1 8mo ago
Anything you do with antigravity in this manner is definitely a clear-cut TOS violation. But my question is regarding gemini-cli where lines get blurry.
240.
by gck1 8mo ago
> the link clearly says that if you are not using the harness provided by Claude for the Agent SDK (such as for making tool calls), you have to use the Client SDK But you just made this up? There's no text on the page that says this

More ›