gcb0

13 ms·

61.
by gcb0 7y ago
hum. sounds like the worst of both worlds... I can almost understand the value for the chia pudding thing that still lack a variety of off-brands. But haagen daaz, toblerone, et al are just the same regular product today (sometimes even low
62.
by gcb0 7y ago
how does the law work when you did something before it was illegal? or why it's not the case here?
63.
by gcb0 7y ago
costco competitor? btw is sam club profitable or still a loss to hold off competition?
64.
by gcb0 7y ago
because publishing business behave like an AI that fixed the goal of increasing revenue as optimizing for engagement... instead of paperclip production.
65.
by gcb0 7y ago
please don't compare selling a book with being a nazi.
66.
by gcb0 7y ago
Lol. Even when that dialog worked as intended, it was total crap! It mostly worked for certain menu items only. Fun game: try to remap Ctrl+a to select all, Ctrl+c to copy etc to mimic unix/windows. (or god forbid, to make your limited
67.
by gcb0 7y ago
For the same reason we have DNS.
68.
by gcb0 7y ago
that just goes to show how bad the name is. It doesn't trick you until before you learn, but it keeps on giving!
69.
by gcb0 7y ago
I see this as the opposite: nyt colluding with silicon valley VCs to show that killing yourself at any and all silicon valley start up is guaranteed to make you a billionaire. just like when wired published that fake profile for Steve Jobs
70.
by gcb0 7y ago
This is orthogonal to google business model, so it will never happen. Specially on Android. To back this claim: Google always had the open source community give them local data solutions on a silver plate, and they always went out of their
71.
by gcb0 7y ago
> billionaire calling out that one executive in her company makes 1,400x the average pay of that company. This is not a revolution, it is just the top class resetting the cost of their workforce.
72.
by gcb0 7y ago
they are doing what everyone do at wildly successful silicon valley companies: building silos/fiefdoms to be the leader behind their money burning next-big-thing-nobody-asked-for project, such as cashierless store or 1984 listening dev
73.
by gcb0 7y ago
you are assuming mistakenly deleted data. circumventing this is very trivial for an attacker.
74.
by gcb0 7y ago
in _practical_ summary: No mitigation. unless you degrade performace considerably or buy a very specific, impossible to find cpu+board+ram combination. also, > some manufacturers implement TRR in their DDR4 products,[26][27] although it
75.
by gcb0 7y ago
osnews.com
76.
by gcb0 7y ago
slashdot.org
77.
by gcb0 7y ago
Does that mean people still have tons of public-by-mistake s3 buckets because of their clumsy UI, and they just gave up and are swiping what's left under the rug?
78.
by gcb0 7y ago
they are flat out admitting to an on-going information (fake news?) war? And that while they could always fight with russia they have no clue how to impact china?
79.
by gcb0 7y ago
that's not how it works. thankfully.
80.
by gcb0 7y ago
cool. hopefully we will have a transcript somewhere?
81.
by gcb0 7y ago
2014... after that they did go to London to interview him and did DNA testing and found nothing too.
82.
by gcb0 7y ago
read the comment you replied to again. hint: it won't be effective at that.
83.
by gcb0 7y ago
this has nothing to do with being correct. there's a rush by law enforcement to create a DNA database. and if you did at a clinic or 23and me et al, be sure that your dna plus some metadata (if not from you, from your payment or from t
84.
by gcb0 7y ago
this confirms that jumping bail was the right course of action. Sweden didn't produce a single evidence of the crime, and US extradition hearings are happening behind closed doors. how isn't this exactly what prompted him to ask f
85.
by gcb0 7y ago
exactly. and that is as valid :)
86.
by gcb0 7y ago
a press release of a Wikipedia for profit, with no information. just flag it.
87.
by gcb0 7y ago
it will have to be profitable to pay back investors. for one difference.
88.
by gcb0 7y ago
while you make the non-free app more appealing by giving in and using them
89.
by gcb0 7y ago
forgot to say, if it already fits your data (i.e. you will have a createdAt column anyway) it is a great choice.
90.
by gcb0 7y ago
ulids and all other attemps to solve this on the taxonomy are either forcing a concept onto your data (what if date is irrelevant?) and gives you false assumptions on distributed systems (just because you can get IDs up to cenrtain date, do

More ›